Well, yeah. Of course not. But it's sort of essential to the story the writer wrote, no? Given the comparison established, the only thing we know is that Smoque has stayed open two years, and that that other one restaurant closed after one year, with several years between the two openings and closings. This is by no means a criticism of Smoque, which I adore and wish will stay around forever. It's a criticism of the piece. For a story about how careful planning pays off, I would have liked to learn what payoff there's been beyond staying open. After all, plenty of restaurants not nearly as apparently successful as Smoque still manage to survive. Has all that Smoque planning - not to mention a half-million dollar loan (compared to that other joint's $17,000 loan) - paid dividends or merely the rent (as it were)? Like I said, I'm simply curious, since it's a huge missing piece of an otherwise incomplete story. Why establish the success/fail dialectic if the story itself fails to define success?
Santander wrote:Well, yeah. Of course not. But it's sort of essential to the story the writer wrote, no? Given the comparison established, the only thing we know is that Smoque has stayed open two years, and that that other one restaurant closed after one year, with several years between the two openings and closings. This is by no means a criticism of Smoque, which I adore and wish will stay around forever. It's a criticism of the piece. For a story about how careful planning pays off, I would have liked to learn what payoff there's been beyond staying open. After all, plenty of restaurants not nearly as apparently successful as Smoque still manage to survive. Has all that Smoque planning - not to mention a half-million dollar loan (compared to that other joint's $17,000 loan) - paid dividends or merely the rent (as it were)? Like I said, I'm simply curious, since it's a huge missing piece of an otherwise incomplete story. Why establish the success/fail dialectic if the story itself fails to define success?
I read it like Vitesse - interesting but flawed article, not challenging or illuminating enough to be a useful guide.
mickimaynard wrote:Hi, I'm the author of the story in the NY Times and read these boards frequently, so I thought I'd answer a couple of your comments.
Since the story was written for Dining, and not for Bizday, we left out some of the information that several people commented on (under the rationale that it was a food story first, and a business story second.)
MBK wrote:their pulled pork is my favorite; i think pulled pork maybe my favorite bbq, but i'm not so sure i'm a fan of the sandwiches (pulled pork sandwiches in general)... is there any other place in the city that does good pulled pork that i can just buy, dip and eat??
MBK wrote:their pulled pork is my favorite; i think pulled pork maybe my favorite bbq, but i'm not so sure i'm a fan of the sandwiches (pulled pork sandwiches in general)... is there any other place in the city that does good pulled pork that i can just buy, dip and eat??
Jayz wrote:2.5 I was somewhat confused about seating after reading the sign and after looking around all I could find was a table for four...and I was just one. Not wanting to stand as I ate my meal I ate at the table of four and felt like a jerk to make others wait. Maybe a wall with stools across it would have been a good alternative for single diners like myself....or maybe I should start dining with others.![]()
Jayz wrote:Not wanting to stand as I ate my meal
riddlemay wrote:I think the "fear" of this (if that's not too strong a word) is why I haven't been to Smoque.
riddlemay wrote:My needs--and they are obviously not the same as those of many of you--
Santander wrote:Jay - alas, sounds like they charged you for the brisket platter as well ($10.45 instead of $8.95), unless you had a big drink.
Jayz wrote:Santander wrote:Jay - alas, sounds like they charged you for the brisket platter as well ($10.45 instead of $8.95), unless you had a big drink.
I think that's what happened...
Ghazi- I'd be fine with however the seating was ran...but who was the person to instruct me where to sit? the cashier made no note of it and I was left standing there with a receipt in my hand and no one else standing...so I awkwardly walked over to a table of four to waste for the next 15 minutes as I ate.