KSeecs wrote:How dare this restaurant serve food high in fat and salt, with nowhere else and nothing else available to eat I am forced to eat unhealthily! I think the problem with this society is the fact that people feel the need to complain and polemicize every damn thing instead of just enjoying the variety and options our free society offers. Please stop the Bloombergerization of America.
Anywho, had lunch at Au Cheval today and loved it. I had the double cheeseburger and split fries with my co-worker. It was one the best made and best tasting burgers I've ever had. I will opt for the single next time as I found the triple patty to be a bit cumbersome to deal with and more food than I needed. Fries were tremendous, essentially a platonic ideal. It was a heavy lunch and one I would not eat every day but for a nice Friday lunch with a couplee beers, it was perfect.
BR wrote:KSeecs wrote:How dare this restaurant serve food high in fat and salt, with nowhere else and nothing else available to eat I am forced to eat unhealthily! I think the problem with this society is the fact that people feel the need to complain and polemicize every damn thing instead of just enjoying the variety and options our free society offers. Please stop the Bloombergerization of America.
Anywho, had lunch at Au Cheval today and loved it. I had the double cheeseburger and split fries with my co-worker. It was one the best made and best tasting burgers I've ever had. I will opt for the single next time as I found the triple patty to be a bit cumbersome to deal with and more food than I needed. Fries were tremendous, essentially a platonic ideal. It was a heavy lunch and one I would not eat every day but for a nice Friday lunch with a couplee beers, it was perfect.
I'm glad you enjoyed it, but you're running pretty loose with the criticism of Au Cheval in this thread. Beyond health issues associated with over-salted food, most people just don't like it when a restaurant uses too much salt (that's why I say "too much" and not merely salted). I'd complain if food was under-seasoned too - is that okay?
Also, while I have enjoyed items at Au Cheval, I think it's a fair critique of a restaurant to suggest a lack of balance or to suggest that the restaurant's fine, so long as you're looking for . . .If you were looking for a place to have a romantic 3-course meal, I believe it would be appropriate for me to tell you that Cheesie's might not be up your alley. There's a difference between trying to legislate against restaurants offering what Au Cheval offers, and judging the type and quality of Au Cheval's offerings.
KSeecs wrote:I'm less interested when people get on their soapbox and try to make sweeping claims about society based on an burger with bacon and egg on it, such as Bruni in his preachy article.
ronnie_suburban wrote: There are only so many times I can eat this type of menu before getting burned out on it.
=R=
Pursuit wrote:ronnie_suburban wrote: There are only so many times I can eat this type of menu before getting burned out on it.
=R=
Not sure, but I think I've found your problem! Stick to one or two items, and a beer...
ronnie_suburban wrote:I love it but it's more or less become an 'every once in a while' place for me. Not surprisingly, it's the same things I love about it that make it so. My last time there, my third, I felt overwhelmed by the heaviness of it all. There are only so many times I can eat this type of menu before getting burned out on it. However, the fact that it's not an everyday place for me doesn't diminish what it is . . . just puts it into tighter focus. Would I want to eat lunch there and return to work afterwards? No. Would I want to show up there with a few friends during a night of drinking? Absolutely. Au Cheval is a wonderful indulgence. Use in moderation.![]()
=R=
Jazzfood wrote:Was there last wk around 1 30. Busy but not crazy. No wait it that's what you're asking.
Independent George wrote:Jazzfood wrote:Was there last wk around 1 30. Busy but not crazy. No wait it that's what you're asking.
Yeah, that's what I was getting at - what are the wait times like for 2 people at 11:30 AM, Noon, and 1 PM? I don't usually eat at noon because I hate crowds, but sometimes I don't have a choice. If it's up to me, I'll go out for lunch at 11:30 or 1.
But the pickle on the side was one of the best pickles I've had in terms of both flavor and crunch.
boudreaulicious wrote:hmmmm...that place isn't very big is it (it's been a while since I've been there but I only recall one room). Seems like if they had a couple of 2-tops available when you called but 10 minutes later they could be gone, that's exactly the reason they don't want to give the wait times. Too likely to cause irritation, as you experienced.
rubbbqco wrote:When they're slow"ish" around 230-300 pm, I've been there and had quite a nice conversation with her...she's smart, converses about food with confidence, and is a perfect fit for her particular job.
rubbbqco wrote:First come, first serve, with no quoted waits - though frustrating - is really the only way you can run this type of operation.
stevez wrote:Yesterday was game day at Soldier Field. Couple that with the "normal" Sunday brunch crowd and it's quite possible that hordes of people arrived at the same time and caused the wait times to balloon within a few minutes. My own experience yesterday at Nana mirrors this. We arrived at 9:30 and there were tons of tables available. By 10:00, there was at least a 45 minute wait. The Bears fans showed up en mass. I suspect the same might have been true at Au Cherval.