rober wrote:My wife and I have been to Bakersfield several times. Overall we like the place a lot. It reminds me of a Weber Grill restaurant, but one in which higher quality ingredients are being used. .
We have only been once, and while I think that comment is close to being correct, to some it will come off as a harsh criticism. The decor is California meets prairie in a nice, large, open plan. Cannot comment on their bar or wine as we brought our own. Menu runs to grilled and comfort food (lots of steaks, nice and aged, along with fried chicken and more), but with higher aspirations, as noted - good ingredients, nicely prepared, well seasoned and garnished.
But the problem is that it is not cheap, or, in the end, that interesting. Seems to be the trend in suburban dining right now - well prepared comfort food using excellent, local ingredients. Not a bad thing at all (aside from gourmet mac 'n cheese, which I always want to like, but never do - I digress), but not exciting either. I just want a little more, whether it is a little more adventurous menu, or more interesting preparations and presentations.
I may go back to Bakersfield when I want some pricey fried chicken, or a very nice, aged steak (which are relative bargains compared to the traditional steakhouses, even if they are the most pricey items on the menu); or not.
My bottom line is that the cafe in the Standard Market is mostly the better choice, though the Bride hates the decor and feel of that place. Same deal on corkage, too (free if you buy the wine at the market).
d
Feeling (south) loopy