waderoberts wrote:Also, resist the urge to use the bland, homogenous, meaningless, media-popular terms like "Chicagoland."
Binko wrote:What's wrong with "Chicagoland"? It's an extremely useful term used to describe Chicago and its suburbs. Would you prefer I use the wordier "Chicago metropolitan area"? "Chicagoland" is a popular, homegrown term, and, personally, I'm quite fond of it. It's most out-of-towners that think it's a silly term, not the natives.
"Chicagoland" reportedly was coined by the Tribune, which automatically causes some to disdain it. This designation for the nine-county area goes back to the early 1900s, so in my opinion it's certainly a valid local usage.
However, it means "Chicago and suburbs." A pet peeve of mine is people who use it to mean only the suburbs, or worse, who use it in gratingly redundant phrases like "greater Chicagoland metropolitan area."
A Google search for "Chicagoland" generated more than 2.7 million hits. I only looked at the first few pages, but the links were all to pages from solid local institutions. "Chitown" finds 132,000 and "Chi-Town" 634,000, many from nonlocals, although it seems to have some popularity among rappers.