I'm not quite sure if this is something I need to share (or boast), but in the last few months, I've tried the following Las Vegas buffets: Bellagio, Wynn, Planet Hollywood, Palm, and Rio (Carnival).
I'm sure I've said this before, but count me as someone [
ed. obviously!] who appreciates a buffet generally, and a Las Vegas buffet specifically. It's part of the fun of Las Vegas. Leaving aside food quality, which I'll get back to, buffets, Vegas buffets are fun for a couple of reasons. There's the lavishness, the gluttony in an over-the-top way that's alluring (you are in Vegas, no). And there's the utility, if you've ever done the Vegas schedule, you know a single meal that can last a good portion of the day is a good thing.
So, which one? Of my recent sample, I would say the Wynn fer sure. it's got a nice combination of semi-luxuiry ingredients (my wife and I pay for the buffet with the amount of white anchovies eaten) and fresh made stuff. It's the same model as the Belaggio. That is, not cheap by any measure, but not the high school cafeteria either. Wynn's newer and just a notch better.
There's a big drop in quality from those two. Planet Hollywood I wanted to try because it featured some Middle Eastern and related foods. Unfortunately, it was about the worst falafal I've ever tried. Palms is really bad, exactly the kinda of tired, Sysco-ized food you most fear. Rio was one of the first of the gourmet buffets, but on my visit in ?September the food seemed quite tired.
I say, first of all, get a buffet; then, second, go to Wynn or Bellagio.
Think Yiddish, Dress British - Advice of Evil Ronnie to me.