Food: a good solid A, if not an A+. Everything we had, we enjoyed, though inevitably some things more than others. Disappointingly, however, service/ambiance rates more like a B. There were four servers for the entire house: two older gentlemen (40s, I would guess) and two younger men (very early 20s). The older ones seemed to take the orders and the youngers ones to remove plates, deliver silver, and bring the courses. Though the restaurant isn’t especially large, it’s big enough and, despite the fact that it was a Tuesday, the place was absolutely slammed—not even counting the regular entry of people coming in without a reservation, hoping for a place. So we counted ourselves fortunate to be served our courses in a (mostly) timely manner. Chef was never once in the dining room, leading us to suspect that he may not have been in the house that night. And so our experience was mixed: though the food was everything Ronnie reported it to be five years ago (the menu has changed remarkably little in five years; there’s a fascinating copy of the menu from 1982 on the net and, with a number of deletions from that larger menu, things haven’t changed much in over thirty years!), the service was nothing like what he experienced. The place was just slammed and there simply was little time for interaction, even had anyone been so inclined.
The gentleman who took our order was, apparently, not English speaking and, though I can manage in French, I’m far from fluent. Since the menu had not changed much since what Ronnie posted, it didn’t take me long to explain the changes to the Lovely Dining Companion. We had some questions about some of the offerings and, eventually, managed to get answers enough to help us choose. Our “order-taker” was neither friendly nor particularly helpful and indulged my French was a slight exasperation. As but one example, LDC doesn’t drink alcohol—a fact which I explained (in French) as a reason for my wanting to order less than a full bottle. Whether glass or carafe matter not to me, but I was having trouble with the wine list since there seemed to be few choices in reds that were anything but a full bottle. I asked for his guidance or help and he a little abruptly told me that he would give me a glass of house Bordeaux. He offered nothing by way of information about it or even whether I might have another option. Over the course of the evening, we would see him a few times, but most of the courses were served (and cleared) by one of the other three, usually the two youngest.
Interior
GougeresThe food, as I said, was terrific. We began with complimentary glasses of white wine (never identified) and an amuse of gougeres, a dish which, I must confess, I am beginning to tire of. We’ve eaten out in more places than usual of late and it seems like the default amuse is gougeres. The ones here were good, but we’ve had better renditions several times. My app was pretty much a foregone conclusion: after reading Ronnie’s post and checking the menu, I had little choice

I knew I had to have a half order of the stuffed morels. Everything Ron reported. If they bottled that sauce and sold it, I would pay dearly for it. Exquisite.
Stuffed morels
Miss Morel’s close-up (inspired by Ron’s “Morel porn” above)
LDC chose a crawfish velouté: light and rich and deep with flavor.
Velouté d’écrevissesFor her main, she went with one of the new dishes on the menu:
dos de cabillaud (back of cod) with Cocos de Paimpol (small white beans) and chorizo.
Cod with white beans and chorizoAlthough the menu is not particularly large, I had a dilemma. There were simply too many tempting choices. I wanted one of everything, a problem tempered by the fact that—although there are a few items that can be delivered as a half-order, there are very few of them and they are mostly apps. How to choose between the confit, the millefeuille of pigeon, the veal sweetbreads, or some of the steaks on offer? It was a dilemma with no solution whatsoever—except perhaps to stay in Paris another week and eat there every night. Since I couldn’t figure out how to manage that, I finally decided on the most traditional, classically French item I could: the boeuf bourguignon. A full order.
The preparation was a little distinct from what I am accustomed to in that there appeared to be some, but not many, onions. I’m used to seeing lots of pearl onions. Plenty of mushrooms, as always. And instead of a little bacon/ham to flavor, there was quite a bit, altering the balance of flavors so that the rich, meaty flavor of the long-cooked beef was nearly evenly balanced with that of the bacon and ham nuggets. I liked it, but I didn’t positively love it. On the other hand, I sopped up every last drop of sauce, so yes, I’d recommend it!
Boeuf bourguignon (with tagliatelle)Dessert proved to be a similar challenge (even though there were but three items available—the Paris Brest wasn’t on the menu—plus a cheese selection), but we finally opted to split the Millefeuille Jean-Louis (apparently named after the chef’s brother), a massive brick that, even after being split by the waiter, was more than a vast portion. Puff pastry with crème anglaise and powdered sugar. No chocolate that we could discern. Who cares? Now we know what the angels have after dinner…
Millefeuille Jean-Louis
MignardisesAll in all, an exemplary dinner. Terrific food but an experience that, sadly, left us wanting. For all the atmosphere of the room itself, it was a fairly sterile experience. We felt no warmth from the moment we arrived to the moment we left. There were plenty of people literally standing in the space between one row tables and the bar, waiting for tables to be vacated. There is no place else, save outside, to wait. And so it increasingly felt factory-like as new diners entered, were seated, ate, and departed. To their credit, we never once felt rushed, but the atmosphere was not particularly welcoming, the people not particularly friendly. Had Chef been in the house (and we have no way of knowing save for the fact that he never once appeared), it might have been different. We didn’t expect a packed house on a Tuesday, and even less since we arrived at the stroke of 7:30 pm when it opened. But packed it was, and packed it stayed all night. (For what it may be worth, dinner--two apps, two mains, dessert, coffee, and one glass of wine--ran about $175. Dinner the night before at La Regalade Saint Honore--which I will post on soon--was about $120 and we preferred it. The food was on a par but I enjoyed the evening far more at La Regalade; fwiw, LDC votes for Chez Dumonet.)
Would we return? In a heartbeat. The food was among the best we had in our very short week in Paris. But Chez Dumonet is on everyone’s radar and finding a quiet(er) evening may be well nigh impossible now. The price of success, I suppose. A pity.
Last edited by
Gypsy Boy on October 25th, 2015, 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gypsy Boy
"I am not a glutton--I am an explorer of food." (Erma Bombeck)