davecamaro1994 wrote:I love the home vacuum packer my friend uses. However, I am too cheap to drop $100+ on a machine that you mainly use for your leftovers.
Higgins721 wrote:Also what about using the one portion of the process of "Cryovacking" guest’s left-overs? Might it be a way to maintain the quality of what they take home, while eliminating those ugly plastic boxes [which are not cheap, nor green]?
Higgins721 wrote:Are any restaurants vacuum packing leftovers? How is it working....guest reactions?
paulette wrote:Check with your local health department, there are usually special requirements for vacuum packing food of which sous vide is one of the special uses.
Paulette
paulette wrote:Check with your local health department, there are usually special requirements for vacuum packing food of which sous vide is one of the special uses.
Paulette
rickster wrote:The inexpensive vacuum sealers like Foodsavers can't be used on anything that has a liquid component like sauces unless the sauce is prefrozen.
Higgins721 wrote:But..... How many chefs are using the Sous Vie cooking method on a consistent basis???
kanin wrote:
This is just a guess, but I think restaurants that serve items poached in a relatively expensive liquid (e.g., olive oil poached, butter poached) probably use sous vide.
In general, I equate "poached" menu items with sous vide, depending on where I'm dining.
Jamieson22 wrote:Wouldn't this be more of a confit that sous vide?
I was just thinking that any poached items and confits (or oil-poached... so they make you think it's healthier:) ) can be easily replicated in a water bath with a lot less poaching liquid involved. Instead of a hot vat of oil sitting on a stovetop somewhere, they can use a few tablespoons and seal it in a bag with whatever they're poaching. It should be much more cost-effective and a lot easier to manage, I would imagine.