Cathy2 wrote:Hi,
The pictures look great! To avoid steam and spitting oil on your camera lens, do you take your picture from relatively far and use the zoom to focus in?
Now the really important question: how did it taste?
Snark wrote:Not to be picky but you may have overcrowded your pan - pics look pretty good though...
eatchicago wrote:Gary,
What were you frying in?
Best,
Michael
eatchicago wrote:What were you frying in?
eatchicago wrote:Besides the skillet....I mean, what type of fat? Crisco?
YourPalWill wrote:Interesting. I've started frying my chicken skinless because I find that the skin tends to get tough at 360 degrees, which is my optimal frying temp for the chicken meat.
Though I understand this was not your intent, frying chick without skin would also reduce the caloric content, which is the main reason I have a hard telling selling the women in my family on eating more fried chicken. I'll give it a shot.
dees_1 wrote: I love the coating and get annoyed when I have to lose it all by taking the skin off. This works well for us!
Bill/SFNM wrote:Skinless fried chicken?![]()
I've been known to batter and fry just the skin!![]()
Bill/SFNM
stevez wrote:Bill/SFNM wrote:Skinless fried chicken?![]()
I've been known to batter and fry just the skin!![]()
Bill/SFNM
I'm with you, Bill. Fried chicken without the skin is a travesty. Why bother eating it? If it's a health concern/issue, why not just have something else?
Bill/SFNM wrote:Skinless fried chicken?![]()
I've been known to batter and fry just the skin!![]()
David Hammond wrote:There's chicken skin and then there's chicken skin. I found the crispy, spiced up poultry epidermis at Luciano’s to be quite excellent; at Del Rhea’s, the skin was looser, more yellow and much less appealing…still, I ate that, too.
Hammond
stevez wrote:David Hammond wrote:There's chicken skin and then there's chicken skin. I found the crispy, spiced up poultry epidermis at Luciano’s to be quite excellent; at Del Rhea’s, the skin was looser, more yellow and much less appealing…still, I ate that, too.
Hammond
Poorly prepared fried chicken is a completely different issue than trying to justify frying chicken without any skin on it. One is poor technique, the other is unspeakable.
LAZ wrote:By the way, Parlor brines its chicken in sweet tea. It's quite flavorful, if only they had a lighter hand with their coating.
David Hammond wrote:Bill Todd (of Todd & Holland) thinks cooking with tea is pretty stupid because the power of tea is in its aromatics...still, tea-smoked duck is fine stuff and I am still searching for a dish I really like that uses tea as a condiment or, better, an ingredient.
YourPalWill wrote:I've started such a controversy here. I find that my skinless checken fries up quite well with a heavier coating of flour. It tends to seal in the juices. From reading Dave Hammonds comparison, I'm starting to think that I am frying my chicken at too low a temperature.
Cathy2 wrote:Hi,
Cook's Illustrated has been continuous revising their brining method. Initially, they suggested going straight from the brine to the oven. To improve crisped skin, they now recommend removing bird from brine, rinsing and wiping off. On a tray lined with paper towels, arrange, arrange chicken on a rack to dry in the refrigerator. For the Thanksgiving turkey, I dry it overnight. For chicken, I might brine overnight and allow it to air dry during the day.
Regards,