Not long ago, I was reading an article by an anthropologist/food historian about food from the New World, and he mentioned that one of his favorite chocolate dishes was champorado from the Philippines. Maybe a week later, at an LTH event, Cathy2 mentioned liking champorado.
I figured that the proximity of the two comments about a food I had never tried was a sign that I needed to start looking for a recipe. Well, recipes were not hard to find, but about the same time I began my search, I was at Unimart, perusing the Filippino delicacies, and I happened upon a package of Champ-O-Rado, a packaged mix for making champorado. I figured it would be the perfect way to sample this dish first, because even though packaged is not as good as homemade, I had nothing to compare the dish to, so would not know if a recipe I found was remotely authentic.
Champorado is generally described as a rice pudding, at least on Internet posts where recipes can be found, and that's what it looks like on the box of Champ-O-Rado. However, following the instructions faithfully, I ended up with something that was more like chocolate soup with rice in it. However, the consistency is not so far removed from Chinese rice gruel that I'm not certain that this is wrong -- but I'm also not certain that it's right.
So, do we have any champorado fanciers out there who can shed some light on this? Is it supposed to be like Chinese rice gruel, or is it supposed to be like rice pudding? Which of the myriad influences on Filippino cooking is most responsbile for this dish, Europe or Asia?
Any insight would be appreciated.