But there's also this quote:
"“Roundy’s has been around the block many, many times in Chicago,” says David Stone, principal with Chicago-based retail brokerage firm Stone Real Estate Corp., who isn't involved in the transaction. “I think they’re finally drilling down.”
The article goes on to mention some sites Roundy's is dragging its heels on, some sites Roundy's is pulling out of, and some sites Roundy's appears to be on the cusp of breaking ground (or "drilling down") on--but the Diversey site is in none of the three categories, because it isn't mentioned at all.
I figured that the closing of the Barnes & Noble at the end of the year--creating a large solid stretch of vacancy on Diversey when combined with the vacant Pier One--was due to Roundy's announced desire for the property, which caused the property owner not to renew B&N's lease in order to clear them out. But now I'm wondering if the B&N closure was an independent event, one that would have happened with or without Roundy's interest in the property. And there's a third possibility: that the B&N closure
was caused by Roundy's expression of interest in the property, an interest that has now evaporated--leaving us with one less book store and a bunch of unemployed people.
It's also possible Roundy's plans for Diversey are full-steam-ahead and the article was just incomplete in not mentioning this. I'm wondering if people who live in the immediate area, and attend neighborhood meetings, know anything more on this.