I do most of my Farmers' Market shopping at the Evanston market - easy to get to - just a few blocks from the Davis St. El stop. There are enough vendors there that I can shop around for who has the best prices. Earlier this year, there was a $1/bunch difference for local asparagus, so I went for the cheaper - but still extremely high quality - stuff.
eatchicago wrote:I considered answering your question but I find the way that you posed it downright rude and offensive. You say that you're not willing to get into a debate about price, but you're more than willing to ask your question by accusing farmers of fleecing and preying on people. This is the equivalent of saying, "don't argue with me, because you're immoral and I said so. Now tell me where I can get cheap produce."
JackieK wrote:This thread actually brings up a conversation I had earlier today that I'd like some feedback on. A friend was telling me that she haggles at the farmer's market, not in a mean way I'm sure, but more as in "how many peaches can I get for x $?"
I've never done this, I always treat posted prices at farmer's markets like the prices in a grocery store and don't question them. Should I? Do other people do this?
Really? I'm with NR - I found tomatoes at the little stand closest to the Metra and parking to often be cheaper by a large margin, was going to buy corn there for $.50 an ear and found another stand selling 13 ears for $5. If you're pinching pennies, shopping around makes a difference (admittedly, sometimes the upcharge involves organics or heirlooms, but sometimes it doesn't)
ronnie_suburban wrote:No matter what one pays for market produce, I'd say it's almost certain farmers aren't getting rich or even making profits in most cases (not that there'd be anything wrong with that). I don't think anyone is being fleeced by these hard-working folks who struggle to make a living, and the implication saddens me.
=R=
foo d wrote:what i was getting at is that it's my sense that the markup by many vendors on the produce they sell at the farmer's market is extremely high.
ronnie_suburban wrote:No matter what one pays for market produce, I'd say it's almost certain farmers aren't getting rich or even making profits in most cases (not that there'd be anything wrong with that).
Kennyz wrote:Luckily, the increasing demand for local food has also brought an increase in the number of farmers looking to sell in this city. In some cases - Daley Plaza Thursdays being a good example- this has meant lower prices.
Kennyz wrote:Having noticed increasingly ridiculous pricing practices from some farmers this year, I share some of foo's sentiments. How in the world does Nichols Farm think they can sell green beans for $6 a pound? Even Fox and Obel sells local green beans for $1.99/ lb. Ridiculous.
Pie Lady wrote:Kennyz wrote:Having noticed increasingly ridiculous pricing practices from some farmers this year, I share some of foo's sentiments. How in the world does Nichols Farm think they can sell green beans for $6 a pound? Even Fox and Obel sells local green beans for $1.99/ lb. Ridiculous.
I'm with you. I paid $6 for a loaf of ciabatta and kicked myself afterwards. But corn is always cheap, thankfully.
Cynthia wrote:So if anyone knows, I'd be curious to find out why, unlike the farm stands of my childhood and youth, prices at farmers markets are not, in fact, an improvement on what one finds in stores.
ronnie_suburban wrote:I'd say it's almost certain farmers aren't getting rich or even making profits in most cases
My guess is that pricing rises or decreases to what the market will bear.
Katie wrote:ronnie_suburban wrote:I'd say it's almost certain farmers aren't getting rich or even making profits in most cases
Just curious, if they're not making a profit, why do you think they do it? To break even on your production and transportation costs, and not make a profit to go toward your other bills, doesn't sound to me like a business. I think the IRS would call it a hobby.
rickster wrote:My guess is that pricing rises or decreases to what the market will bear.
There was an interesting article a couple of years ago in the New York Times about a huge farmer's clearing market in Benton Harbor, MI. One of the comments in the article from local farmers was that they could easily get double the price for produce if they sold at Chicago farmers' markets vs. selling locally.
I wonder if this was simply a pricing/pricing comparison or if it took into account all the additional expenses of having to convey the goods to Chicago (fuel, time away from the farm, vehicle upkeep and maintenance, additional employees to man various stalls at the markets, etc.)?