aschie30 wrote:Darren72 wrote:I'm just disappointed that these weren't that good since I made a point to pick them over the WA apples.
And if the Washington apples weren't that good, would you be likewise disappointed that you chose Washington apples over Michigan apples? I'm just trying to understand your post - it sounds like Washington apples are your standard, and you're disappointed now that you chose non-Washington apples?
In my opinion, apples are apples and they tend to vary. I don't think any one state, be it, Michigan, Washington, or even New York produces "better" apples. But, Michigan is such a huge fruit producer, that there's something silly about eating Washington fruit, or Oregon fruit or whatever, when the crop produced two states over is so huge that a lot of it goes unpicked. (It goes beyond fruit as well - I read somewhere that MI is the second largest crop producing state in the nation, behind California, of course.) Anyway, I wouldn't read too much into your Whole Foods experience. I always find that whenever WF attempts to go outside its usual produce suppliers, and carry "local" produce, it's done in a half-hearted, feeble manner. The smaller grocers, like Caputo's, do a much better job. I hope Whole Foods continues to improve in this vein (I appreciate that they are at least making the effort), but I fear that changing a huge corporation's normal business practices is much like fighting city hall.
Aschie30, I'm a little baffled that I need to explain my post. But here goes: Whole Food had about 10 varieties of Washington apples and one variety of Michigan apples. I picked the MI one because I thought of this thread and basically agree with "that there's something silly about eating Washington fruit, or Oregon fruit or whatever, when the crop produced two states over is so huge that a lot of it goes unpicked." In particular, I didn't pick the MI apples because I wanted a McIntosh or for any other reason.
As I said, I was disappointed that the fruit wasn't that good (would have you have felt differently?). Had I picked one of the WA apples, maybe those wouldn't be good either. Had I picked MI apples at another store, maybe they would have been great. Had I picked different MI apples from the same batch at WF, maybe they would have been great. But I didn't. I picked those four apples from the MI batch at WF and was disappointed I lost the fruit lottery on that day.
As I said in my post, I do not draw any conclusions about MI (or WA) apples from this experience. Yet, you seem to think I did exactly that.
I knew someone would write in and challenge my post. This is silly and I can't believe I'm actually writing more about this episode. I have to wonder: if I wrote that I bypassed 10 bins of WA apples and bought some of the MI apples, and then reported how great they were, I'm sure you'd write in to say that I shouldn't read too much into my Whole Food experience.
You said "it sounds like Washington apples are your standard, and you're disappointed now that you chose non-Washington apples". If I may be so bold, perhaps you shouldn't read too much into my post. If you must know more about my apple-shopping habits, I usually try to buy apples at the Green City Market. Sometimes they are good, sometimes not so much. Sometimes I buy them at Whole Foods or Harvestime. Sometimes these are good, sometimes they aren't. Yes, buying fruit can be a lottery, no matter what your source is. Next time I try to report on a food experience, I will try to give more details about my state of mind, what general conclusions I'm drawing or not drawing, and what qualifications there may be to said conclusions. Or, maybe I'll just tweet that I bought some good apples and leave it at that.
Last edited by
Darren72 on January 28th, 2010, 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.