Cathy2 wrote:When one is tired, wants something to eat immediately, then a quick look in the refrigerator and pantry does give you a sense of nothing to eat. There is plenty of food though nothing is ready to eat, because it needs to be cooked, assembled or otherwise prepared.
I think that's true - the sense that there is "nothing to eat" surrounds the need for a quick snack - one that you take out of the attractive packaging and just eat. Even the best cheese would need to be cut up. My kitchen, too, is filled with ingredients, and I've always been the "cook" for whoever I've lived with, going way back, which meant I also did the shopping. Add to that, I don't snack, so if I'm thinking only of me, my tendency would not be to buy snacks. So that others are not disappointed by my "lean" shopping habits, I've learned to buy one or two things that are shelf stable for people to snack on (Trader Joe's chocolate almonds with sea salt, cookies, or something that I know someone particularly likes, for example) and stick those items in the cupboard. I tend to forget those items are there, so their existence doesn't bother me, and I've never heard anyone complain that there isn't anything to eat in the house.
Now, I think this issue comes up mostly with guests. So I try to be extra sensitive to their needs around visit time and, in the past, have bought items that I never would have dreamed of to keep the peace. (My brother's wife, for example, is practically vegan. The other day, I found a tiny bag of some type of sprout/sesame/wasabi/nature juice snack in the back of my cabinet from a long ago visit, and started cracking up as I slam-dunked it into the garbage.)
Cathy2 wrote:What does generate discussion around my house is when food spoils and is thrown away. I have taken to tossing somethings discretely to avoid discussion.
In Jacques Pepin's
The Apprentice, in a very soul-searching moment, he admitted that a source of great marital discord between he and his wife surrounded his perception that she wasted food. To Pepin, wasting food was tantamount to a cardinal sin -- certainly an immoral act -- because he grew up starving in France during WWII. His American wife, on the other hand, did not share those same experiences, and had no moral issue with tossing away what he deemed to be perfectly good food. To make things worse, she didn't even like eating leftover food. After he realized that yelling at her wasn't going to get her to change her mind, and she realized that her actions just plain upset him, their unspoken compromise was that she would only throw things away if done discreetly, out of his presence, and after he had ample time to eat the food. If he had food in the fridge before he left for a business trip, he didn't expect that she would eat it while he was gone, or even that it would be there when he came back. And, in return, he didn't make an issue of it.
Sometimes the path of least resistance is the best.