What Makes a Blue Ribbon Winner...and Who’s to Judge? At the Iowa State Fair last weekend, I spent much time at tables heavy with ribbon-winning fruits and vegetables in multiple categories. I was fascinated. What can be the criteria for making the selections, I wondered, recognizing in my vast ignorance that such criteria must exist, and are probably written down (at least some of them, I have to suppose) though I have no idea what such agricultural arcana must be like.
Consider this bunch of garlic.

From Erik Francois of Des Moines, this garlic won the blue ribbon in its category (Root Vegetables) and it won the Overall Winner in Ag and Hort Crops (I think that’s like Best of Show). My understanding is that this garlic was not tasted (unlike the pies and casseroles and other cooked food contestants), so my understanding (and I’m hoping someone will enlighten me if I’m wrong here) is that the winning decision was based on aesthetics alone (how it looks, how it feels, maybe how it smells?).
Or check out this winner in the Feed Corn category:

I can't imagine what subtle eye discerns the differences among myriad cobs that all seem pretty much alike.
Consider the challenges of judging jars of beans. How can one make fine distinctions between, say, a third place and a fourth place winner (and some of these categories had up to seven ribbon winners)?

And what in the name of Demeter can be the criteria that come into play when assessing the arrangement of agricultural products in these Joseph Cornell-like frames?

Anyway, food judging done independently of taste is alien territory to me. I did some quick searches but have yet to find a “handbook” of judging criteria for state fair competitions like this. It’s very possible that the general principles employed vary a lot based on the individuals who are actually called upon to be judge in what may be world’s slowest moving (and yet oddly tense and subtly suspenseful) spectator sport.
"Don't you ever underestimate the power of a female." Bootsy Collins