Cathy2 wrote:Josephine wrote:OK, first--no, make that second--post of the day:
You know you are an LTH-er when you wake up from a dream in which you are debating with Cathy2 and eatchicago about the proper use of emoticons.
"Emoticons: Do They Have A Legitimate Place in Our Discourse, or Are They Just Cheap Tools for the Inarticulate?"
(Me, I like 'em even though they are cheesy ':oops:'':)')
What was my opinion on the emoticon argument? I know we have never discussed this, so I am curious if subliminally you happen to know.
Cathy, I thought you might ask. . .
In the dream, you were quite firm in rejecting emoticons, saying that you felt they impoverished the accompanying prose. This I was surprised to hear from you, and I had to protest. You reiterated your stance with some supporting evidence that is now forgotten by me. As for eatchicago, he suggested that the
judicious use of the emoticon was all right, but that he felt they were overused in general. For me, the emoticons have a kind of naive, campy appeal that stands in contrast the some of the writing on the board.
So, Cathy and eatchicago, is my dreaming self in fact aware of your positions on emoticons?
Man : I can't understand how a poet like you can eat that stuff.
T. S. Eliot: Ah, but you're not a poet.