chgoeditor wrote:I think you first have to ask yourself how much of a foodie he is, and whether he's a heavy internet user. I'm sure there are a lot of similar terms of art used in other kinds of online communities, but those of us who have no interest in the subject (or even those of us who are interested in the subject, but not active in related online communities*) would be oblivious to the terms.
I agree with chgoeditor. I think the use of the term "food porn" is more a matter of community than region of the country. I've met plenty of people surprised by and unfamiliar with the term, but this naievte, if you will, seemed to be determined more by their proximity to "foodies" than where they live.
The reference to
Harper's actually made me think of my first application of the term "food porn." One of the most clever
Harper's covers in my memory featured a photograph by Chicago-based artist Jeanne Dunning. It ran on the March 2000 issue, and the image was
Sundae 1, which shows a profile of a person lying down, his or her face covered with whipped cream and a cherry. The image was actually tied to an article about obesity among working-class immigrants, but considered alone, the image could be read as highly sexual, especially considering Dunning's <i>oeuvre</i> which consists of multiple series of work in which food is manipulated and shot to resemble sexual organs and fluids. In short, I first used "food porn" to describe Dunning's work, which I guess was almost 10 years before I'd use the term to describe the kind of luscious food photography at which LTHers so excel. I've never read any scholarship or memorable criticism of Dunning, but I imagine I'm far, far from the first person to evoke this term in discussion of her photographs.