Khaopaat wrote:This all ends in 1.5 weeks, when I eat my way through Madrid & Sevilla
aschie30 wrote:Truism No. 1 About Fasting:
'Tis Easier To Fast When You Will Be Travelling To Madrid And Seville In 1.5 Weeks.
happy_stomach wrote:Good luck, David. I usually do at least two fasts a year and have experienced wonderful results. Days #2 & 3 are always the worst for me--I become aggressive and scary, convinced that my body is going to eat itself--but I always feel great by day #7 or so and totally blissed out by day #10.
Khaopaat wrote:aschie30 wrote:Truism No. 1 About Fasting:
'Tis Easier To Fast When You Will Be Travelling To Madrid And Seville In 1.5 Weeks.
Aye, there's no better motivator than the mental image of hip Madrileños pointing & shouting, "¡Mire eso americano con la tapa del mollete! Vayamos lo empujan en el estómago."*
*"Check out that American with the muffin top! Let's go poke him in the belly."
Translated by Babelfish, so blame Yahoo! if it's all wrong
jaholbrook wrote:I understand that you're not looking to change your diet long term but it goes through an initial fast / cleanse which is just about the opposite of what you describe i.e. Fast for 3 days (water only), then go to just fruit, then to fruits and veggies.
David Hammond wrote:jaholbrook wrote:I understand that you're not looking to change your diet long term but it goes through an initial fast / cleanse which is just about the opposite of what you describe i.e. Fast for 3 days (water only), then go to just fruit, then to fruits and veggies.
Right, yes, I thought I'd ease into it rather than just go cold turkey with water to start. Thanks for the book rec; I'll check it out.
The first step is a change of diet. The priest was only allowed to eat nuts and seeds that could be found in the forests surrounding his temple; this diet had to be stuck to for a 1000 day period, a little under three years. During this time, the priest was to continue to subject himself to all sorts of physical hardship in his daily training. The results were that the body fat of the priest was reduced to nearly nothing, thus removing a section of the body that easily decomposes after death.
In the second stage, the diet became more restrictive. The priest was now only allowed to eat a small amount of bark and roots from pine trees (mokujiki). This had to be endured for another 1000 day period, by the end of which the priest looked like a living skeleton. This also decreased the overall moisture contained in the body; and the less fluid left in the body, the easier to preserve it.
Towards the end of this 1000 day period, the priest also had to start to drink a special tea made from the sap of the urushi tree. This sap is used to make laquer [sic] for bowls and furniture; but it is also very poisonous for most people. Drinking this tea induced vomenting [sic], sweating, and urination, further reducing the fluid content of the priest's body. But even more importantly, the build up of the poison in the priest's body would kill any maggots or insects that tried to eat the priest's remains after death, thus protecting it from yet another source of decay.
The third and last step of the process was to be entombed alive in a stone room just big enough for a man to sit lotus style in for a final 1000 day period. As long as the priest could ring a bell each day a tube remained in place to supply air; but when the bell finally stopped, the tube was removed and the tomb was sealed.
A better central Spanish idiom for muffin-topped would be bien tapizado, which literally means well or over-upholstered, and is used precisely to mean stuffed into a pair of pants too small. Rechoncho is another good one.
During the Edo period, some Buddhist priests in northern Japan engaged in sokushinbutsu, a form of prolonged suicide by self-mummification that existed long before people began consuming the food from McDonald's:
Hellodali wrote:Sharon, what kind of fast do you do for 10 days? I've done cleanses that are two days just water then 5 days of fruit, veggies and brown rice. I have felt better but the two days total fast are tough.
Cynthia wrote:Jaholbrook is right -- you jump in, and then ease out. Your system can easily take stopping eating, but starting again can be hard on it (of course, how hard depends on how long you fast -- on long fasts, it's as if your body forgets what to do with food). So stop completely (except water, perhaps with a little lemon juice), and then ease back into eating with the juice, fruit, veggies, broth, and so on.
It's also actually easier to just stop than it is to ease in -- simply stay busy. I find it much harder to edge in slowly.
pairs4life wrote:While it is for religious purposes, the biggest draw back I find is feeling especially sleepy, not tired or weak, but genuinely sleepy during this time. I suspect it is very similar to the hibernation of bears and snakes.
pairs4life wrote:On a non-religious plane, I think it makes those of us who are food lovers value it all the more and allows us the ability to strip away those things that are not true.
Cathy2 wrote:While I am sure the participants didn't consider this suicide, I do wonder how this ritual was framed in their theology.
Puppy wrote:Cathy2 wrote:While I am sure the participants didn't consider this suicide, I do wonder how this ritual was framed in their theology.
Those who successfully self-mummified themselves were enshrined as "living" Buddhas, considered a great achievement. Apparently the large majority who attempted this failed, as their bodies rotted during the entombment. I believe less than 20 mummies exist to this day.
happy_stomach wrote:Good luck, David. I usually do at least two fasts a year and have experienced wonderful results. Days #2 & 3 are always the worst for me--I become aggressive and scary, convinced that my body is going to eat itself--but I always feel great by day #7 or so and totally blissed out by day #10.
The fast has begun. I'm at Day #1. Headed into dinner hour, I'm not at all hungry (I ate a lot over the weekend).
Odd as it may sound, in recent weeks, I'd actually grown a little tired of food. This wasn't a consistent state of mind (far from it), but every now and again, food would just start to get a little boring for me. So today, slipping into total abstinence from food was not hard...though I anticipate that tomorrow and into Day #3, it will get more challenging.
David Hammond wrote:48 hours without food, and no hunger experienced.
pairs4life wrote:David Hammond wrote:48 hours without food, and no hunger experienced.
I thought as much. What I have discovered, with each Baha'i Fast, is the realization of how little food I actually need. I also find I become more stringent about what I eat post-fast. I don't mean they type of food, Old Fashioned Doughnuts Apple Fritters would still be a part of my eating experience, but the quality. Whether the food is high nutritional value or not, it had better be extra tasty or else I don't want it, especially if the nutrient value is low.
Peace,
Mhays wrote:Apparently Hot Doug's is running a special just for you! (ask them to hold the fries)