LTH Home

Interesting article on obesity

Interesting article on obesity
  • Forum HomePost Reply BackTop
  • Interesting article on obesity

    Post #1 - September 9th, 2011, 10:41 am
    Post #1 - September 9th, 2011, 10:41 am Post #1 - September 9th, 2011, 10:41 am
    an article about marijuana smokers and their lower obesity rates.

    http://healthland.time.com/2011/09/08/m ... dy-weight/
  • Post #2 - September 9th, 2011, 12:53 pm
    Post #2 - September 9th, 2011, 12:53 pm Post #2 - September 9th, 2011, 12:53 pm
    Interesting. My guess is it is substituting one thing for another. they are getting satisfaction from something other than food. Not going to work for me as I much prefer food to anything that could be smoked. Hate smoking of any kind.

    Here is a novel idea ......eat less exercise more.

    I just lost 23 pounds by eating roughly half of what I used to eat. Now my appetite has shrunk as well as my stomach and I no longer crave sweets as I did. I have many more pounds to go.
    Toria

    "I like this place and willingly could waste my time in it" - As You Like It,
    W. Shakespeare
  • Post #3 - September 9th, 2011, 2:31 pm
    Post #3 - September 9th, 2011, 2:31 pm Post #3 - September 9th, 2011, 2:31 pm
    The beauty and degree of information of correlational studies...

    The relation was only true when controlling for age and sex. I wonder why they dont mention conclusions for their second model.

    We adjusted for sex and age in our first model and for sex, age, race/ethnicity, educational level, marital status, region of residence, and smoking status in our second model
  • Post #4 - September 10th, 2011, 7:38 am
    Post #4 - September 10th, 2011, 7:38 am Post #4 - September 10th, 2011, 7:38 am
    theskinnyduck wrote:The beauty and degree of information of correlational studies...

    The relation was only true when controlling for age and sex. I wonder why they dont mention conclusions for their second model.

    We adjusted for sex and age in our first model and for sex, age, race/ethnicity, educational level, marital status, region of residence, and smoking status in our second model


    Actually, it is the opposite. If you look at their Table 2, the relationship between obesity and cannabis use is only statistically significant when they don't control for anything. Once they control for these factors, the odds ratios are not statistically different. Strangely, they don't note this in the text.
  • Post #5 - September 11th, 2011, 4:09 am
    Post #5 - September 11th, 2011, 4:09 am Post #5 - September 11th, 2011, 4:09 am
    Good for you, Toria!
    "Your swimming suit matches your eyes, you hold your nose before diving, loving you has made me bananas!"
  • Post #6 - September 13th, 2011, 7:12 am
    Post #6 - September 13th, 2011, 7:12 am Post #6 - September 13th, 2011, 7:12 am
    Just found another article that's interesting, authored by Jane Brody:

    "Attacking the Obesity Epidemic by First Figuring Out Its Cause"

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/13/health/13brody.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&ref=health
  • Post #7 - September 13th, 2011, 8:07 am
    Post #7 - September 13th, 2011, 8:07 am Post #7 - September 13th, 2011, 8:07 am
    Darren72 wrote:
    theskinnyduck wrote:The beauty and degree of information of correlational studies...

    The relation was only true when controlling for age and sex. I wonder why they dont mention conclusions for their second model.

    We adjusted for sex and age in our first model and for sex, age, race/ethnicity, educational level, marital status, region of residence, and smoking status in our second model


    Actually, it is the opposite. If you look at their Table 2, the relationship between obesity and cannabis use is only statistically significant when they don't control for anything. Once they control for these factors, the odds ratios are not statistically different. Strangely, they don't note this in the text.


    That was exactly my point.

Contact

About

Team

Advertize

Close

Chat

Articles

Guide

Events

more