teatpuller wrote:Raw apple and oyster seems like a strange combo.
ronnie_suburban wrote:Anytime I see them prepared in any other manner, internal alarms go off for me. =R=
Kman wrote:I think there's quite a difference between the presentation of a solitary oyster as an amuse bouche and an establishment dressing entire orders of oysters in a similar manner, unordered (which no one has yet claimed is going on here).
David Hammond wrote:Kman wrote:I think there's quite a difference between the presentation of a solitary oyster as an amuse bouche and an establishment dressing entire orders of oysters in a similar manner, unordered (which no one has yet claimed is going on here).
True, my example is of a single order, but about a month ago I ordered a half- dozen at Homestead and they all came dressed. I liked them so much I'm working on a longer newspaper piece about them and will post the link here when it's published. I was, as I've mentioned, taken aback when I saw them but I ended up liking them quite a lot. I should say that on the menu, they were not advertised as "dressed," and I can certainly see how that might be a problem for some. It was actually kind of a problem for me, and I think Carolyn too, but I ended up being turned around by them.
Kman wrote:David Hammond wrote:Kman wrote:I think there's quite a difference between the presentation of a solitary oyster as an amuse bouche and an establishment dressing entire orders of oysters in a similar manner, unordered (which no one has yet claimed is going on here).
True, my example is of a single order, but about a month ago I ordered a half- dozen at Homestead and they all came dressed. I liked them so much I'm working on a longer newspaper piece about them and will post the link here when it's published. I was, as I've mentioned, taken aback when I saw them but I ended up liking them quite a lot. I should say that on the menu, they were not advertised as "dressed," and I can certainly see how that might be a problem for some. It was actually kind of a problem for me, and I think Carolyn too, but I ended up being turned around by them.
See now, that's a big difference IMO. I'm glad the result was found to be pleasing but there's a situation where I'd expect this to either be noted on the menu or for the server to mention this. I'm totally accepting of the fact that the kitchen's additions *could* make for a great flavor combo but my expectation when ordering oysters on the half-shell is that they be naked. If the kitchen sends out mignonettes and other various items on the *side* that's OK but I don't want someone adorning my oysters anymore than I'd want them to decide to pour ketchup on my steak.
David Hammond wrote:
I agree...but here's the thing. If it were indicated on the menu that the oysters were dressed, I probably wouldn't have ordered them. But I ended up liking them, so I can't say I'm glad the condiments weren't listed on the menu. It's a kind of conundrum.
Now, if the kitchen had sloshed on some cocktail sauce, mignonette, or even lemon...that would have been a problem.
I'm always reminded of a disastrous dinner Frank and I had at Bobby's in Deerfield,
where the crabcakes came with spaghetti and cheese inside them![]()
and the escargot were topped with mozzarella!
Katie wrote:My first-ever oysters (and I can still see, in my mind's eye, everything about the place and the night) were in Panama City, Florida, slid out of their shells onto saltines and and dabbed with cocktail sauce, lemon juice, and horseradish. I can have them other ways, but for better or for worse, that remains my baseline. I guess that's a variation on the Pizza Cognition Theory, which plays a role in so many discussions of what's "right" and "wrong" about certain foods and dishes.
Katie wrote:Point taken. I did say "for better or for worse." However, if you consider that the Panama City oysters were the watershed between the never-ate-an-oyster and I-love-oysters parts of my life, I hope you can see why I forgive them any shortcomings.