Ramon wrote:Back to the show with the brats. I'd stopped watching Check Please due to my annoyance with the diverse and opionated guests, the gratuituos and overly contrived food porn shots between segments, and the host who rubs me the wrong way despite her pedigree. I found none of these elements nagging in this episode.
JimInLoganSquare wrote:I'll agree that, somehow, Alpana seemed more in her element with this show, or at least more at ease with her guests. But she still is a ROTTEN TV presenter. Her voice has no modulation or tonal control; everything comes out at one (HIGH) volume, with that nasally tone and over-enthused expression. I'd like to see Bob Sirott mend fences at WTTW and take this over. Seriously, other than the "wine facts" bumpers, Alpana's professional creds are really pretty much irrelevant ... and the bumpers are, by definition, not essential to the content of the show. Paradoxically, the more a person is trained in an expert field OTHER than acting/speech, the LESS their intelligence shows when they speak (unless they just have that rare natural talent and a good voice; which most academics and professionals -- hell, most PEOPLE -- just do not have). When your job is speaking to a camera, your first and most important job requirement is being able to SPEAK, not just talk. Anyway, how about having rotating hosts? Maybe Ken Nordine would like to take a shot at it; I'd love that! "Food Jazz" -- yeah, sounds about right.
YourPalWill wrote:I'm opposed to anything that encourages people to bring children into grown up restaurants.
They have restaurants for children. They're called Chuck E. Cheese and McDonalds. Children prefer them.
Darren72 wrote:YourPalWill wrote:I'm opposed to anything that encourages people to bring children into grown up restaurants.
They have restaurants for children. They're called Chuck E. Cheese and McDonalds. Children prefer them.
I don't remember the restaurants reviewed by the kids on the Check, Please episode, but my recollection is that they were restaurants aimed at kids, not grown ups. One was a medieval fair concept, for example. One was a seafood place, as some else remarked, but it wasn't a high end place that was clearly an adult restaurant.
YourPalWill wrote:I'm opposed to anything that encourages people to bring children into grown up restaurants.
They have restaurants for children. They're called Chuck E. Cheese and McDonalds. Children prefer them.
YourPalWill wrote:I'm opposed to anything that encourages people to bring children into grown up restaurants.
JeffB wrote:YourPalWill wrote:I'm opposed to anything that encourages people to bring children into grown up restaurants.
They have restaurants for children. They're called Chuck E. Cheese and McDonalds. Children prefer them.
Bold and sweeping statement. I'll bite. My six-year-old son's favorite places include Tank, BA's, Khan, Garden Buffet, Sabatino's and Spacca Napoli. (I'll admit that there's a very strong fire-related theme here). He and I stumbled upon Katy's Dumpling House while looking for food in the burbs. Every single one of said places is a family restaurant. Granted, my three year old daughter would probably prefer McDonald's most of the time, but she humors the rest of us. They have restaurants for adults, too. They're called TGI Friday's and McDonald's.