ChitownB wrote:
"you're not going to have that on a wrap sandwich that is mean to be soft. It just won't work. IMO, that's a silly thing to be complaining about."
How is it silly to complain that a product doesn't actually contain its namesake ingredient, naan, or to complain that a sandwich (defined by its "bread") had such poor quality bread that it detracted from otherwise great filling?
Those seem to be about the two most legitimate things one could complain about something called a "naanwich".
Also, I disagree that typical Indian naan would not work with their fillings. It would work better than what they are (sometimes apparently) using which didn't work well at all. Real naan would actually stay softer around the edges and less soggy in the middle because its not as porous and absorbent than the almost cornbread-like wrap in question.
But regardless, even if their lack of use of real naan (or anything better than the wrap I had) was a logistical constraint due to their being forced to make them hours in advance, it is still doesn't change the fact that is made for a low quality dining experience and thus is a rather un-silly thing to complain about. I (and I suspect JustJoan) am not so concerned with
why the wrap wasn't good, but only with the fact that it wasn't good. Whether I eat more or recommend them to others depends solely on the latter.