YourPalWill wrote:GEB should dispense with Flay effortlessly.
stewed coot wrote:Should have been called "Iron-clad conflict of interest". One of the judges owns the public relations company that represented one of Flay's restaurants, his catering company, and 3 of his cookbooks. She no longer works with him, and hasn't for 8 years-But, she still represents a hotel that houses one of his restaurants. This is all in today's Trib.
I like how the Food Network exec says that all the judges know of, or have eaten Flay's food anyway so it's no big deal- as if eating his food is the same as having these deep connections with him.
I don't know who should have won, but I do know this judge shouldn't have been there.
Oh well, I've always felt that cooking isn't baseball-can't see the value of culinary competition.
stewed coot wrote: This is all in today's Trib.
It's TV ferchrissakes
sundevilpeg wrote:It's TV ferchrissakes
...but a conflict of interest is a conflict of interest, no? Why taint the result with the appearance of impropriety?
sundevilpeg wrote:(speaking of which, the close-ups of her cleavage were a tad bit much, don't you think?)
Diannie wrote:sundevilpeg wrote:It's TV ferchrissakes
...but a conflict of interest is a conflict of interest, no? Why taint the result with the appearance of impropriety?
Only if you buy the premise that this program is somehow more than entertainment, that the results of the competition mean something and the winners go on to universally recognized greater glory.
gleam wrote:To bring a male perspective into the cleavage debate: Karine Bakhoum's cleavage is definitely not an, er, asset.
Josephine wrote:Just for the record, I find Mr. Flay's TV persona to be devoid of sex appeal. Other women on the board may differ with me, but I doubt it. Unfortunately, his virtual cuisine is also lacking that je ne sais quoi.