stewed coot wrote:While it's true that Rock Bottom would be good for a group, it has an appropriate name. Food may be acceptable, but avoid the beer-it's tragic.
I have to disagree on your assessment of the beer. I met Rock Bottom's brewmaster Peter Crowley last year on the Chicago Beer Society's famous Brews and Blues Cruise, and he brought along a couple of kegs of his Belgian-style witbeer, which was exceptional. He used an appropriate combination of yeasts approximating the local airborne yeasts of the area around Leuven, and it was nicely flavored with the traditional coriander and bitter orange, for a very refreshing brew. One of the interesting things about Rock Bottom is that, while it's a chain, they give the brewmaster at each location quite a bit of latitude to determine what they want to make, in addition to the usual suspects that have to be made/offered to placate BudMilCoors drinkers.
IMHO, Rock Bottom, while not quite up the high standards set by Goose Island, delivers very good beers. (By contrast, I was out at Flatlander's in Lincolnshire last night to watch the Bears game, and was distinctly unimpressed with the flat, thin flavor of their stout, and their lager, pale ale and red ales were workmanlike, but commonly-available bottled versions are typically much better.)
So, in my feeble attempt at threadjacking, I'm curious what specifically about Rock Bottom's beers would cause someone to characterize them as "tragic"? I can respect your right to your opinion, and intelligent people can differ, but it would help to have some specifics that led you to your opinion.
Maybe this discussion is best moved to the Drink board?
Edit to note: This applies only to the River North location; I have no info either way about their other brewpubs.
Last edited by
nr706 on December 12th, 2006, 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.