Mike G wrote:Yeah, I was about to say, I sure miss having a butcher to cut my Select beef...
Hell, ten years ago I tried to get Jewel to give me a package of hamburger in something other than 1-lb. increments (I wanted about 1-1/3 lbs.) Couldn't be done. (I also asked once at Dominick's for 6/10ths of a pound of ham, and the girl standing next to the digital scale stared at me and said "How am I supposed to figure that?")
Same thing happened to me at "our" Whole Foods (Ashland and School) once. I wanted two-thirds of a pound of something. (A half-pound seemed too little, a pound seemed too much.) The girl behind the take-out counter didn't seem like a functional idiot, but she could not understand that two-thirds of a pound means .67 on the scale--surely as easy a target to shoot for as .50, 1.00, or any other. My conviction that people who work behind counters with digital scales should understand how to turn simple fractions into decimal-point numbers resulted in a verbal struggle between us (i.e., I was not willing to get a pound just because she was a functional idiot or because our public schools are not doing the job we pay them to do, and she wasn't willing to weigh me an amount she couldn't understand and was resistant to seeking help from another clerk).
She's not there anymore, and I have no reason to think the other folks behind the counter are as arithmetically challenged as she was, but this experience chastened me into changing how I ask for amounts, just because I never want to go through that nightmare again. Instead of asking for a third-pound or two-thirds, I'll say "a little under a half-pound," or "a little under a pound," or whatever. It's better than staring into the abyss.