peterc wrote:So, can you recommend to me a good scale?
So, can you recommend to me a good scale?
Saint Pizza wrote:should I try to form it in a loaf and bake it on a cookie sheet, or do you think the size of my dutch oven is OK? if i remember correctly from all of your descriptions, the dough moves around a lot and maybe putting it on a cookie sheet is not a good idea.
kit - where did you find the campagne starter?
a cast iron dutch oven. i'd like to use it for this bread recipe but am afraid it's too big. I think it's about 10 quarts.
eatchicago wrote:Please forgive this basic question from a neophyte bread baker, but I'm just having so much fun with this baking method:
If I wanted to add things to this bread (such as chopped walnuts, carraway seeds, or dried cranberries) at what point in the process would it be best to do this?
Best,
Michael
I THOUGHT the Dining section published the easiest bread recipe possible last year when Mark Bittman wrote about the no-knead approach of Jim Lahey, owner of Sullivan Street Bakery. ...
The method he wrote about, though, looks like molecular gastronomy next to the one developed by Jeff Hertzberg, a physician from Minneapolis. His technique is more or less as streamlined as this: Mix flour, salt, yeast and water. Let it sit a bit, refrigerate it, take some out and let it rise, then bake it.
The crusty, full-flavored loaf that results may be the world’s easiest yeast bread.
Binko wrote:I made the new easy bread recipe last night. I have to say, it's not really that much easier than the other recipe. It's certainly much faster, taking about 4 or 5 hours from start to finish, but with this recipe you need a pizza stone and a peel. I didn't have a peel, and my dough kinda stuck to the surface I formed the boules on, so I had to kind of wiggle a spatula underneath to get it loose and then pick up with my hand to plop down onto the pizza stone. I thought the other method was easier, really.
Anyhow, on to the bread. It was good. Heck, any homemade bread is usually good. However, not nearly as crusty as the other bread, and I also got a bit of a denser crumb. If you divide the recipe into 8 (instead of 4), I think they'd be perfect for making buns.
All in all, I think the bread produced by the other recipe was much better. Thicker, crispier crust, better crumb, although, flavorwise, not a heck of a whole lot of difference.
AngrySarah wrote:I finally made this over the weekend. Mrs. AS saw a version of this in Vogue and I tried to replicate that.
I set the oven for 550, which produced a great crust but a little raw inside it seemed. I also loosen the knob on my dutch oven (le crueset says do not heat above 450, but I wrapped it in foil and did it anyway. Don't tell.) Next time, I'll do it at 500 for the whole time. I took it out early because it was starting to burn on the outside.
It WAS messy.
It was very much worth it. For about 30 cents in ingredients you can have a loaf worthy of serving anyone.
Next time I'll put the parchment on the kitchen towel.
Santander wrote:Can someone provide a neutrally-worded adaptation of the 2.0 recipe, or even just the points where it differs from the original "no"-knead Dutch Oven recipe?
Santander wrote:Thank you both. Other comments above suggest 2.0 works (or is designed for) the Dutch oven. But would oiled parchment paper really go in the DO, or only if you were opting for a stone / sheet?