You raise some good points. I agree that the do-over on the Restaurant Wars was planned. Why? In previous years, it's been anti-climactic. Both teams, pressed with the enormous task of opening a restaurant, planning a menu, and serving to "real" clientele, certainly don't have enough time to do it right. So you get the sense that both teams are stumbling to the finish line in what is, in my opinion, one of the most interesting challenges of the show. If you read Tom's interview on bravotv.com, he acknowledges that value of any restauranteur having soft openings, listening to criticism, and fixing mistakes and how that is part and parcel of any restaurant-opening process. So I gather that the decision was deliberate.
gastro gnome wrote:Can we just say on remaining chefs: Chicago 1, New York 0.
Better than that: Chicago 1 of 1 (so far); New York 0 of 4 (as of a few episodes ago).
gastro gnome wrote:If Micah got sent home because she talked down about American food (in addition to bad meatloaf), how exactly is Hung still around? I know, I know - he cooks better food. But he's thrice as haughty.
Micah was not sent home because she talked down American food. She was sent home because the judges (and, apparently, the Elks) thought her meatloaf was the worst dish. Given her comments about meatloaf, and how it was something "she would never eat," I'm not surprised she made a bad meatloaf.
gastro gnome wrote:As for Howie: it's Top Chef not Top Personality. Howie's won two Elimination Challenges and has been in the top 3 on a number of the Quickfires. I'm not sure if Sara Mair had a pulse until she had bad blood with Howie a couple of epi's back.
I agree that working with a team is important for being successful in any environment, certainly a kitchen. But this doesn't seem like a valid way to eliminate contestants - at least not yet. The judges keep talking up 'being a leader' and/or working within a team at judges table but they send the person packing who is responsible for the food (See Joey being sent home rather than Hung who could have been more insistent. Or Sara being sent home rather than anyone on her team who didn't tell her the burgers weren't going well. Or Tre being sent home rather than CJ who was ostensibly team captain and crawled into a lobster shell and did only one over-salted dish).
To be honest, I don't think that they are considering leadership until later, likely in the final round, where the contestants are exec chefs and have complete control over the menu and the kitchen. If the food is bad, then they try to determine what each person contributed to the effort and make their decision from there. Otherwise, they would have dinged Howie long ago for making some unappetizing dishes *and* being hard to work with. Each time, however, someone always cooked worse food than he did. And that's what makes the difference.
I'll agree with that point, but perhaps in the early stages, eliminating based solely upon the food, rather than leadership, is an easy and legitimate way to separate the wheat from the chaff. Sometimes the line between the lack of teamwork and bad food is very thin. I can almost guarantee you that Howie's head would have been on the block had he again resisted Sara in the kitchen (even though she was EC) and their team came out last. I think Howie knew that, which is why, ultimately, he listened to her. So teamwork (or lack thereof) at least has factored in the back of the contestants' minds at this point.
gastro gnome wrote:It is unfortunate that Tre got the axe, even though others who have played it safe got left behind.
Eh, I don't feel sorry for Tre any more than anyone else who is ousted. His ouster was fair, even more fair, than some of the others. He was a victim of his own overconfidence. He sticks with a beef dish that the judges were so-so on in the previous week. (Tom also stated on bravotv.com that, for him, Tre's sticking with that beef dish was what put Tre over the edge for elimination.) He conceives of a beet-cured salmon- pesto dish that sounds like a mess on paper, and apparently tasted worse in person judging by Ted Allen's response. The bread pudding, which he could "do in his sleep" also sounded like a disaster. Even though he was executive chef, he apparently gave CJ and Casey a wide-berth in executing dishes which were not properly seasoned or overcooked.
All of which makes me wonder why Tre was deemed a front-runner anyway. Yeah, he won a couple of challenges (one of which was for executing the design plan for frozen food), but he was in the bottom of several challenges, including a barbecuing challenge where he was (again) over-confident about his abilities to execute a style of cooking native to his native Texas. In general, his quiet, confident manner gave the impression of competence, but that doesn't necessarily translate to skills in the kitchen or leadership. Based upon everything I've seen thus far, I wouldn't have placed Tre above anyone else in the pack at this stage in the competition.
I've come to the conclusion that every year, the viewership gloms onto one or two people as frontrunners either because of their credentials going into the show, or because of their demeanor on the show, and not necessarily because of their skills. Do I think Tre showed promise? Yes. But I wasn't ready to place him in the front.
And don't get me started on CJ's overratedness . . .