JLenart wrote:I-pods at the dinner table? Thats a bit much.
Darren72 wrote:JLenart wrote:I-pods at the dinner table? Thats a bit much.
Is it really that different from a restaurant playing music through a standard speaker system? Or is that the point?
I'm trying to be a little provocative, of course. I almost vowed not to return to Schwa after my first visit and couldn't hear the conversation at the table over the very loud (and awful) music in the dining room.
gleam wrote:I have to say that the music at Schwa was the best I've heard in a restaurant, low end or high end, for many years.
Different strokes.
JLenart wrote:Darren72 wrote:JLenart wrote:I-pods at the dinner table? Thats a bit much.
Is it really that different from a restaurant playing music through a standard speaker system? Or is that the point?
I'm trying to be a little provocative, of course. I almost vowed not to return to Schwa after my first visit and couldn't hear the conversation at the table over the very loud (and awful) music in the dining room.
Actually yes it is quite different. To me at least, dining is a shared experience. "Here, plug this into your ears" takes away from that. At Schwa I never experienced what you have. but what I'm getting at is that sending out and I-Pod is at least a bit pretensious.
"Different strokes."
Darren72 wrote:JLenart wrote:Darren72 wrote:JLenart wrote:I-pods at the dinner table? Thats a bit much.
Is it really that different from a restaurant playing music through a standard speaker system? Or is that the point?
I'm trying to be a little provocative, of course. I almost vowed not to return to Schwa after my first visit and couldn't hear the conversation at the table over the very loud (and awful) music in the dining room.
Actually yes it is quite different. To me at least, dining is a shared experience. "Here, plug this into your ears" takes away from that. At Schwa I never experienced what you have. but what I'm getting at is that sending out and I-Pod is at least a bit pretensious.
Yes, I understand the difference too. Like I said, I was trying to be provocative and it wasn't meant as a serious question. Clearly, eating with an ipod takes much away from the experience of dining with others. I wouldn't want to do it. But I am sure others may appreciate it more than me. Sorry if I didn't make my true intentions abundantly clear and unwittingly began what promises to be among the most senseless discussions on the boards tonight.
aschie30 wrote:gleam wrote:I have to say that the music at Schwa was the best I've heard in a restaurant, low end or high end, for many years.
Different strokes.
Was the music at Schwa via personal, force-fed I-Pods? I don't think the music at Schwa is the issue.
I remember reading GAF's Fat Duck review awhile back, and the thing that stuck out to me was the absurdity of someone plugging an I-Pod into someone's ears to "hear" the sea/make the dining experience, dude, into a multi-sensory experience, mate.
gleam wrote:aschie30 wrote:gleam wrote:I have to say that the music at Schwa was the best I've heard in a restaurant, low end or high end, for many years.
Different strokes.
Was the music at Schwa via personal, force-fed I-Pods? I don't think the music at Schwa is the issue.
I remember reading GAF's Fat Duck review awhile back, and the thing that stuck out to me was the absurdity of someone plugging an I-Pod into someone's ears to "hear" the sea/make the dining experience, dude, into a multi-sensory experience, mate.
I was responding to Darren, not JLenart. My apologies if that wasn't clear.