aschie30 wrote:The greatest hurt, however, came from the show's shots, every one of which included someone tattooed and pierced.
I bet the editors/producers said, "Well, if we show 'normal' looking people there, a lot of regular folks might go there based on that and be dismayed to discover that every one who works there is tattooed and pierced. And we don't want to be responsible for that." (It is, after all, the case that everyone who works there is tattooed and pierced. At least everyone that I've ever seen.)
Every editorial decision is a choice of commission (even if it looks like a choice of omission), and this one was probably committed not because of a wish to sabotage Kuma's business but because the show didn't want to be responsible for sending "regular" Channel 11 viewers to a place they'd end up being uncomfortable. Better to exaggerate the "dangers" and then any regular WTTW subscribers who venture there anyway can't say they weren't forewarned.
I don't agree with that decision, because as a non-tattooed, non-pierced and semi-regular person, I've felt very comfortable at Kuma's, and I've seen other customers who look like me when I've been there, but I can see how the editorial choice got made.
(Also, after taping at gosh knows how many Chicago restaurants by now, most of which are probably indistinguishable, the producers were no doubt grateful for one that had some visual differences from all of the others, so they gravitated to those differences.)