YourPalWill wrote:Eatzi's did a very honorable thing when they entered this market and staffed that Century Mall location with young employees from underprivileged neighborhoods. Unfortunately, they were never properly trained in what they were doing and the place always had this feel of the little gourmet market that wasn't..
I never knew Eatzi's had done this, and if I had, I would have liked them better (or forgiven them more). They probably should have publicized this example of good works. As it was, they only reaped the downside (employees not all of whom seemed in tune with Eatzi's gourmet ambitions) without reaping any of the upside (customer goodwill towards the store for doing the right thing).
Most of the staff was friendly, but I know what YourPalWill is talking about when he says "never properly trained." It wasn't a big deal--nothing egregious or anything--but you could detect it, and it may have affected the overall experience just enough to discourage enthusiastic re-visits. It's such an intangible thing. I don't ever recall a bad interaction at Eatzi's. In fact, I enjoyed many of my interactions there. But as a customer, you also enjoy a sense that the employees of a place are committed to the special mission of that place, not just working there. You want, ideally, a sense that the employees have been waiting all their lives for a place like that to open, just so they could be a part of it. Improbable as it seems for a relatively low-wage field, you get a little of that at Whole Foods. You get it at Pastoral. You didn't get it at Eatzi's.
It may be unfair to expect that level of self-commitment to the mission when employees are, in fact, "just working there" and not because they already had a passion for the field (or can do a credible job of faking it)--but nevertheless, when customers can choose between a place that doesn't deliver that sense and a place that does, they will choose the latter.
There's a fine line between a place getting the word out about the good it's doing for the community and blowing its own horn in a self-righteous or transparently self-serving way, but, as far as I ever knew, Eatzi's never tried to find the right side of that line, because I never knew about their policy at all. (Except insofar as I could infer it.) I don't know how they could have done it--that's a tough one--but others have figured it out, it seems to me.
I think another key failing was, as others have said, too many items looked better than they tasted. But it was a good place to have. Mrs. riddlemay liked it better than I did, and was sad when I told her the news, so for that reason also I wish it had made it.