Aaron Deacon wrote:Do you do a simple sugar and salt brine, or do you add more flavors? I'm trying to find my recipe from last year, the first time I brined the turkey (quite successfully, I might add), but am coming up short.
Erik M. wrote:Once again, I am following the Chez Panisse method. I have tried various brining methods over the years, and this one is great. It is simple, straighforward, and fail-safe.
Cathy2 wrote:Hi Steve,
Do you use the cheesecloth? I have heard Martha's method for gravy is quite good, also.
Vital Information wrote:I'm gonna grill again. Who's for/against butterflying?
Cathy2 wrote:Unlike Chez Panisse, CI suggests a much shorter brine time. If you need to do it overnight, then they suggest cutting back on the salt.
Aaron Deacon wrote:CI also calls for using table salt, while Chez Panisse calls for kosher. CI says 1 cup of table salt per gallon or 1 1/2 cups of Morton kosher or 2 cups of Diamond kosher for a short brine, or half that (1/2 cup table salt, 3/4 cup Morton kosher, 1 cup Diamond kosher per gallon) for the longer brine.
David Hammond wrote:Aaron Deacon wrote:CI also calls for using table salt, while Chez Panisse calls for kosher. CI says 1 cup of table salt per gallon or 1 1/2 cups of Morton kosher or 2 cups of Diamond kosher for a short brine, or half that (1/2 cup table salt, 3/4 cup Morton kosher, 1 cup Diamond kosher per gallon) for the longer brine.
Aaron,
Do you (or anyone else) understand the reason for the differing quantities of table salt vs. kosher. I'm guessing that the finer grind (and dissolve-ability) of the table salt makes the solution "saltier," but is there any other reason to prefer one over the other?
Hammond
gleam wrote:Use non-iodized table salt and it'll be identical..
Steingarten tested this a number of years ago for Vogue, taste-testing various specialty salts vs normal table salt when equal quantities (masses) dissolved in water. By and large, people couldn't tell the difference.
David Hammond wrote:
I notice that many brining recipes suggest not using iodized salt, but I can't imagine that would make much of a difference...or does it?
Incidentally, your reference to the Vogue article confirms a suspicion of many (including me) that it's not the "quality" of the salt so much as the "grind" (or particle size) that makes a lot of difference. I have noticed, though, that some salts -- like Maui Pink, for instance -- have a more mineral-y taste than regular table sale.
Hammond
David Hammond wrote:gleam wrote:Use non-iodized table salt and it'll be identical..
Steingarten tested this a number of years ago for Vogue, taste-testing various specialty salts vs normal table salt when equal quantities (masses) dissolved in water. By and large, people couldn't tell the difference.
Gleam, very sensible advice.
I notice that many brining recipes suggest not using iodized salt, but I can't imagine that would make much of a difference...or does it?
Incidentally, your reference to the Vogue article confirms a suspicion of many (including me) that it's not the "quality" of the salt so much as the "grind" (or particle size) that makes a lot of difference. I have noticed, though, that some salts -- like Maui Pink, for instance -- have a more mineral-y taste than regular table sale.
Hammond
stevez wrote:that it didn't matter what kind of salt you used for cooking. People could not tell a difference. However, the results were completely different when it came to salting food after cooking. When salt was added "at the table", tasters preferred the higher end salts over table salt and kosher salt. Adding at the end of cooking helps preserve the fresh unique taste that a particular salt brings to the dish. I guess the reasoning is similar to why you add fresh herbs at the end of cooking rather than at the beginning.
Manning wrote:Last year we slow roasted at a low temp; this year Jim is brining.
There are a number of recipes, but they seem to contradict each other. High heat? Low heat? Cover or no? Brine or no brine?
SteveZ wrote:Contrariwise, my understanding is that there is no reason NOT to add higher-end "finishing" salts during cooking...except for the cost factor. In other words, it's a waste of money, but it wouldn't really matter much to the taste of the final product.
stevez wrote:I'll be cooking it in a modified* Martha Stewart stylefor the third year in a row. As much as I hatge to admit it, prisoner #55170-054 knows how to roast a picture perfect roast turkey that comes out very juicy.
Cathy2 wrote:There is another Turkey Gravy on her website. I saw it last night and wondered if this is the one you said required so much effort.
Erik M. wrote:Sometime, when I gain more distance on my pain, I will tell you about the year that my Aunt ruined one of those day's labour, in the blink of an eye. I turned my attention from the M.S. stock that I was warming on the hob, but only for a minute, and when I snapped to, I found my Aunt dumping a gob of gravy base in.
Happy Thanksgiving,
Erik M.
ErikM wrote:Well, if it is not the very same, it shares with the original one crucial component-- it appears simple and straightforward. But, seriously, I though that the recipe I followed involved roasting turkey parts, first. Additionally, I remember chilling the strained stock to set the fat.
Vital Information wrote:I'm also off to Taqueria La Oaxecena to see if they'll part with some mole. If that's unsucessful, anyone ever "make" mole from the green powder sold around town? I tried doing it last year, mixing the mole powder with turkey stock but I cannot say I liked the results.
Rob