MelT wrote:am I biting off way more than I can chew, and should I start with the WSM?
crrush wrote:Hey, welcome to LTH. You've come to the right place.
To answer your question:MelT wrote:am I biting off way more than I can chew, and should I start with the WSM?
IMO yes, and YES.
As a student of the 5 Easy Dinners program, I'll admit to a bias, but I can't imagine an easier way to learn and make kick-ass bbq than on a WSM. Wait 'til you perfect your technique before you go blowing cash (and time) on a brick pit.
MelT wrote:Maybe I will get the WSM and work out my game before I go brick. I just hate to wait. Isn't it possible for me to learn my technique in a brick smoker? If I follow some well done plans of experienced pitmasters, shouldn't the resulting pit be servicable, even for a newbie?
I just know I will want the space of a bigger smoker. And I know I will be using the thing for years, so why not start big? Also, it seems that temperature control would be easier in brick.
BTW, JeffB has the best piece of backyard cookery ever.
Thanks all for the info. Keep it coming.
MelT wrote:Isn't it possible for me to learn my technique in a brick smoker? If I follow some well done plans of experienced pitmasters, shouldn't the resulting pit be servicable, even for a newbie?
I just know I will want the space of a bigger smoker. And I know I will be using the thing for years, so why not start big? Also, it seems that temperature control would be easier in brick.
stevez wrote:MelT wrote:Isn't it possible for me to learn my technique in a brick smoker? If I follow some well done plans of experienced pitmasters, shouldn't the resulting pit be servicable, even for a newbie?
I just know I will want the space of a bigger smoker. And I know I will be using the thing for years, so why not start big? Also, it seems that temperature control would be easier in brick.
These statements alone reinforce the need to get some experience before building something as permanant as a brick pit. You've obviously got a bit of a learning curve ahead of you.
MelT wrote:I appreciate the comment, but please tell me why my statements are off base.
MelT wrote:Also, I was thinking that the fire box (where the smoking coals go after they have been burnt down) may be better placed to the side of the cooking box, rather than below (to better control the heat). What are your thoughts on that and other modifications?
MelT wrote:stevez wrote:MelT wrote:Isn't it possible for me to learn my technique in a brick smoker? If I follow some well done plans of experienced pitmasters, shouldn't the resulting pit be servicable, even for a newbie?
I just know I will want the space of a bigger smoker. And I know I will be using the thing for years, so why not start big? Also, it seems that temperature control would be easier in brick.
These statements alone reinforce the need to get some experience before building something as permanant as a brick pit. You've obviously got a bit of a learning curve ahead of you.
I appreciate the comment, but please tell me why my statements are off base.
Muttster wrote:Second - it appears that the heat source is directly below the meat. That will require quite a bit of monitoring especially if you use wood. It would also be very easy to oversmoke the food which will give it a bitter taste.
MelT wrote:OK, OK. . . . but doesn't every teenager dream of the Lamborgini?
teatpuller wrote:is it too cold out to use the kettle smoker now?
Muttster,
In the Wilber D. Hog style of pit wood is burned to coals prior to placing in the firebox. This results in barbecue that is, typically, less smoke flavored than off-set. In extreme cases over smoking will impart a bitter acrid taste, but it's more often the result of a mismanaged smoldering fire.
Enjoy,
Gary
We now determine that the pig should be cooked with hardwood that has been burned to coals. And furthermore that the coals must be placed in a manner so that they have a direct line of light to the pig.
MelT wrote:they regard gas and electric smokers, and the BBQ competition circuit, as "the anti-christ"