maxpower wrote: How does it differ from standard Royal Oak lump charcoal?
maxpower wrote:Does anyone have any info on this product? How does it differ from standard Royal Oak lump charcoal?]
G Wiv wrote: Does it say where it was made?
stevez wrote:According to one of the Berger Bros., all of it (regardless of brand) is made at the same place in Missouri.
G Wiv wrote:stevez wrote:According to one of the Berger Bros., all of it (regardless of brand) is made at the same place in Missouri.
Steve,
I've been told the same thing at Berger Bros, but Naked Whiz has Royal Oak listed as being manufactured in four different countries, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and USA.
Enjoy,
Gary
stevez wrote:I'm sure that's true. I'll bet Berger Bros meant that all charcoal that they sell for use in the USA is manufactured in Missouri...even the French Roayal Oak that they were selling for a while.
G Wiv wrote:stevez wrote:I'm sure that's true. I'll bet Berger Bros meant that all charcoal that they sell for use in the USA is manufactured in Missouri...even the French Roayal Oak that they were selling for a while.
Steve,
I'm not so sure of that, I will make a point of asking next time I'm at Berger Bros, as I am sure will you.
Enjoy,
Gary
stevez wrote:The French Royal Oak for sure is manufactured in Missouri. It was that French labeling that prompted me to ask about the origin of their charcoal (since brands seem to change all the time) in the first place.
I was going to schedule a field trip to the Ceader Grove charcoal works. Hwever, even though I knew the company had changed hands, I didn't realize that they shut down the Ceader Grove kilns. All Grove Charcoal is now imported from Canada; where they used to get the scrap wood. Apparently it is cheaper to process and ship the lighter charcoal, than the raw lumber. Canada most likely would rather ship value-added product than raw materials.
I apologize greatly for this aside, and the mods are free to delete it if they see fit, but I just couldn't let it go.maxpower wrote:Hi Guys!
The bag says it is made in USA, although does not give a location.
So far it lit well and is maintaining my WSM at between 225-245, My pork butts are looking and smelling good.
I did noticed there did not seem to be any rocks or lumber pieces in this bag, although I have had the Red bags of Royal Oak in the past not contain any of those elements. There does seem to be less sparking when lighting the chimney and the price was exactly the same as the Red Bag.
funholidaygirl wrote:I will start off by saying that I am a novice griller, but I need help.
When I first moved to Wisconsin I bought charcoal at the local mexican grocery store, I don't remember the brand but it was blacked charred pieces of heavy wood. I think I remember red on the bag but that is it. That charcoal would burn all day long almost and I loved it. Best of all it was really inexpensive, like $1.99 or $2.99 a bag. The store was Racine Produce.
funholidaygirl wrote:Are there some natural lump charcoals that are heavier? Grove is light in weight and is Cowboy Charcoal and I remember this stuff being heavy.
funholidaygirl wrote:I have only seen Kingsford at Racine Produce now. If you recall Royal Oak being there that was probably it. It does look slightly familiar.
Are there some natural lump charcoals that are heavier? Grove is light in weight and is Cowboy Charcoal and I remember this stuff being heavy.
T Comp wrote:Strolling through Costco the other day and came upon a lump hardwood from the Original Charcoal Company. Sold as two 10 pound bags packaged together, priced at either $8 or $9. Well I decided to add to the multitude of 40 pound Berger bags already in the garage. Lit some up this weekend and a 10 pound bag was just right for 4 slabs of baby backs in the WSM. It initially sparked a lot more than the the Berger's but settled down and kept a steady 225 degrees for three and a half hours. The compact size made it easy to gift the other bag to my brother, in my attempt to get him off the Kingsford.
ronnie_suburban wrote:JSM, I really like those Royal Oak foodservice briquettes you show in your post.
JSM wrote:Lately I've gravitated away from lump because it just seems to burn too hot and fast. Great for grilling a steak or some chops, but for smoking "low and slow" I've found that I can get a longer burn time with a more even temperature range while using less fuel with Royal Oak 100% hardwood briquettes.
swine dining wrote:Where are you finding the Royal Oak briquettes in 40# food service bags? I've been amazed how fast my smoker has been blowing through Royal Oak lump. Thanks