Since this came up recently in another context: If you post a recipe on your blog, and then link to it from here, it will NOT be included in the index to LTHForum recipes. Only recipes actually posted on this site are indexed.
So Cathy2's request and chicagofoodlover's subsequent post make the mojito recipe more accessible to LTHers.
The other reason for not posting just a link to another site is that the other site may disappear, making your post not very useful in the future.
IMHO, the best way to promote your website or blog to LTHForum readers is to post interesting and relevant information here and include the URL in your signature line.
However, it seems to me that if a brand-new poster had shown up and written:
Okay, I literally think this Mojito served at
XYZ Restaurant is the absolute best. I love mojito's and if you have a mojito that you think is better, let me know! I am in the eternal quest for the best Mojito.
people here would have been all over him or her as a shill. Are blog shills more acceptable than restaurant shills?
I'm not asserting that chicagofoodlover is behind epicurista.com, although the writing style seems remarkably similar. However, if chicagofoodlover isn't epicurista, then, yes, it's a copyright violation to post this blog entry verbatim on LTH. If she is, then it's somewhat disingenuous to write, "I also tried the caiparinha recipe that they had on that site and it was really good."