iblock9 wrote:Just water and beans? O-M-G!!! I am sure the coffee is delicious but $11!
The Golocha was the best cup of coffee I've had, ever. Actually it was about three cups, more than one person ought to drink at one sitting. Blue Bottle isn't the kind of place I'd frequent (even if I could afford it) but I'll never regret spending that $11.
stevez wrote:I'm not sure how new-fangled that gizmo is. I can remember my grandmother and mother both having similar coffee pots when I was a kid. Of course, they were't as sci-fi looking, but they functioned in exactly the same manner.
The quartz-halogen gizmo is fairly recent but the method is not new at all, predating your Bubbe by nearly a century (see Matt's post and the link within). Vacuum pots were very popular in the US in the first part of the 20th century. Here's a nice picture from William Ukers' beyond-amazing
All About Coffee from 1935 that illustrates this.

Davooda wrote:And if I am not mistaken those two-level aluminum Italian coffeemakers we used in Tuscany last year operate on the same principle, too - though admittedly w/o the cool glass globes.
If you're talking about a
Moka Express, it's not quite the same. That type of pot forces hot water up through packed coffee grounds but doesn't suck it back down. Partly because of the lack of an efficient filter the resulting coffee is very different.
Llama wrote:Intelligentsia has been stocking two sizes of them for a couple months now. They even come with cute little propane Bunsen burners.
Yes, I've had my eye on the
Yama stovetop pot (I wish they carried 5 cup size). Intelligentsia's price is better than any I've seen online.
Mhays wrote:The cost might have been partly due to the beans: some Ethiopian coffees produce very small crops (though typically it's a Yirgacheffe that's at a premium) Though it does seem that they've made yet another advance in adding more labor costs to the production of a pot of coffee.
I always wanted to try a vacuum pot, myself - I had heard the same things about the cleanness of the resultant cup. In looking at it, though - how is this different (other than visually) from a stovetop percolator? The only real difference that I see is that the finished coffee ends up back in the water chamber, rather than in the top chamber of the coffeepot.
Yes, the beans were special, or at least Blue Bottle thinks they are. I didn't give their full pedigree because I don't remember the details (my eyes glazed over while listening to the recitation).
I think two significant differences between vacuum pots and percolators are temperature control and filtration. By the time the water contacts the grounds in a vacuum pot it is well below boiling, ideal for extraction without bitterness. Percolators continuously reboil already brewed coffee. Vacuum pots have a filter between the two chambers whereas percolators typically have only a perforated basket.
It would be very interesting to use the same beans and compare a vacuum pot with other methods. I suspect Blue Bottle's siphon coffee is so good because of both beans and technique.
cilantro wrote:Ray's in Philadelphia's Chinatown has been serving siphon coffee for twenty years now, at about 1/2 of the prices above.
There's a nice article about Ray's in the Spring 2007 issue of
Gastronomica. I would have mentioned it before but I don't think it's available online.