We have become BIG fans of Schramsberg even though it is not champagne in the strict sense.
RAB and I attended a sparkling tasting at a friend's house on Sunday. The N.V. Schramsberg Mirabelle Brut Rose was one of my favorites ($24 at Binny's). I thought it compared quite favorably to the higher-priced wines we tried.Cinny's Mom wrote:We have become BIG fans of Schramsberg even though it is not champagne in the strict sense.
I am also a big fan of the Schramsberg. I brought a couple bottles to a BYOB New Year's dinner a few years ago and the table agreed that the Schramsberg paired better with some of our starting courses than the more expensive Champagne (like Vueve) also being poured.
I also routinely drink both Cristalino and Segura Viudas, especially if I am making cocktails featuring a sparkling wine.
We didn't have it on Sunday, but I can also highly recommend the Iron Horse Wedding Cuvee (USA, California, the 2004 is $33 at Sam's).
In terms of inexpensive sparkling whites, these are both really nice. I tend to drink a lot of Cava for my inexpensive sparkling, that or prosecco.PitaChip wrote:We didn't have it on Sunday, but I can also highly recommend the Iron Horse Wedding Cuvee (USA, California, the 2004 is $33 at Sam's).
I'll second the Iron Horse Wedding Cuvee - Sam's even has it off and on for around $24/bottle. It also makes a nice engagement present.
I also really like Scharffenberger, which is usually between $15 and $17 and is available at Sam's. http://www.scharffenbergercellars.com/index.html I can't find the article now, but John and Dotti from the WSJ's Tastings column gave it good marks about a year ago when they were tasting inexpensive sparklers. It's not going to blow your mind, but is has some really nice character. Yum! I can't wait for tonight...
leek wrote:Santander wrote:What do we think of Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin (especially La Grande Dame?)
We think they are the Mondovi of Champagne, what do you think of them? They buy a lot of wine in bulk (not grapes, already made wine) for the Yellow Label. They declare a vintage pretty much every year (most other houses do not - in fact it was a real problem for the 1999-2000 NYE parties, and some suspected that a vintage was only declared in 1995 because of the millenium - most places didn't declare any vintage between 1990 and 1995)
(We went there for a tour, and compared to all the other places were utterly underwhelmed. When you spend a week in Champagne, and drink lots of Champagne, you get a really nice chance to compare)
Cinny's Mom wrote:We have become BIG fans of Schramsberg even though it is not champagne in the strict sense.
I am also a big fan of the Schramsberg. I brought a couple bottles to a BYOB New Year's dinner a few years ago and the table agreed that the Schramsberg paired better with some of our starting courses than the more expensive Champagne (like Vueve) also being poured.
I also routinely drink both Cristalino and Segura Viudas, especially if I am making cocktails featuring a sparkling wine.
jpschust wrote:Just had another thought- it's not Champagne, but it's methode champinois (sp?)- What about a killer bottle of Schramsberg reserve? the 99 is out of this world.
Leyla a wrote:what is champinois????jpschust wrote:Just had another thought- it's not Champagne, but it's methode champinois (sp?)- What about a killer bottle of Schramsberg reserve? the 99 is out of this world.
budrichard wrote:Don't mean to be brutal but i will be. If you don't know anything about sparkling wine and particularly Champagne, then spend your money on a case of US non-vintage sparkling wine like Domain Chandon. Otherwise you might as well just tear up $100 bills and drink Andre'.
Seriously, US sparklers are a good value and the $/Euro puts Champagne at an economic disadvantage. My last Champagne purchase was two cases of Pol Roger at a particularly good price but that's it.-Dick
That's a good strategy with just about anything.Darren72 wrote:budrichard wrote:Don't mean to be brutal but i will be. If you don't know anything about sparkling wine and particularly Champagne, then spend your money on a case of US non-vintage sparkling wine like Domain Chandon. Otherwise you might as well just tear up $100 bills and drink Andre'.
Seriously, US sparklers are a good value and the $/Euro puts Champagne at an economic disadvantage. My last Champagne purchase was two cases of Pol Roger at a particularly good price but that's it.-Dick
Or, buy a mixture so you can learn to appreciate the differences and know what you can expect at different price points.
My general view of wine is that you have to learn to "work up". If you regularly drink wine that is under $20, you will likely not appreciate the difference between a $50 and $100 bottle. It's best to move up gradually so you can appreciate the differences. (Yes, I know that price does not equal quality, you should be able to see what I mean.)