David Hammond wrote:I think of chicken breasts as the tofu of the meat world: bland, inoffensive, able to absorb whatever it's cooked in, but not something for which I would long.
Dmnkly wrote:Cynthia...
I should add, I'm not anti-breast by any stretch of the imagination. I'm just tired of the stigma dark chicken meat carries in the States of being an inferior, cheap cut of meat. There are few things that gall me more than somebody writing off a restaurant because they used "cheap, fatty dark meat". There are beautiful things about chicken thighs that breasts will never achieve, and I consider it one of my missions to fight the tunnel-vision that keeps those things from being widely appreciated.
Cynthia wrote:Gosh -- I had always thought of the drumstick as being America's favorite part, so it never occurred to me that dark meat was put down. I've read so many humorous bits about breeding chickens with six legs, and such, I assumed that, other than in the classic dishes I knew, everyone picked dark, given the choice.
According to Bill Roenigk, senior vice president of the National Chicken Council, Americans have expressed a strong preference for white meat over the last 20 years. Dark meat's color and fat are what make it less attractive, he said, and it's also more difficult to mold dark meat into shapes.
Right now, most dark meat produced in the United States is exported to Russia and the Middle East.
Cynthia wrote:nr706 wrote:seebee wrote:What are some of these dishes that you referring to?
Chicken Kiev and Chicken Cordon Bleu are two classic dishes that come to mind.
Exactly. And Chicken Kiev is one of my favorites.
Chicken Excelsior House and Chicken Rochambeau also come to mind, but I can't remember a menu in France or Italy that didn't have several offerings featuring chicken breasts.
And of course a proper chicken salad is always made with breast meat (and mayonnaise).
Of course, chicken breast is frequently used as a less-expensive substitute for veal, so one sees a lot of chicken saltimbocca or similar. But that's not really the same as being a classic dish, is it?
seebee wrote:
I wonder if these "classics" are really more healthy than how thighs are used. I don't mean that to be sarcastic in any way whatsoever. I just wonder if the dark meat recipes that most people use are less fat/calorie laden than the recipes used with breast meat. If the same recipes are used for each, then yes, the breast meat wins the healthier food battle.
Cynthia wrote:I can't imagine anyone in a Chinese store attributing the eating of any part of the chicken to "white people."
and thought of you as I enjoyed a thigh
aschie30 wrote:Personally, I wouldn't brine a boneless, skinless breast. That seems the surest way to breaking down the proteins past the point of mealiness. But I tend to be judicious in my brining of any protein for precisely that reason. Brining bone-in chicken in buttermilk for frying, now that's another story.
jimswside wrote:I just change the brining times, and brine mixture based on what I am cooking.
G Wiv wrote:jimswside wrote:I just change the brining times, and brine mixture based on what I am cooking.
Exactly!
Geo wrote:Crispy--pls tell me about the overnight marinade in buttermilk.
Geo -- if you use the "signature" feature in the "Profile" section of User Control Panel for your account, past posts automatically update with the most recent signature, irrespective of when the original post was made. Basically, the signature is independent of the content of the post. But seeing as how the perception could (obviously) be otherwise, I am going to update my (currently non-existent) signature to state "Call me, crazy, but I predict in the year 2009 America will have a black president and the Arizona Cardinals will play in the Super Bowl," so that my posts from back in 2006 look extremely prescient.Geo wrote:[BTW, if you look at Hammond's comments in that thread there's something weird: the thread dates from '05, but Hammond's sig contains a quote from '08. In addition to all his other esteemable features does the guy *also* own a time machine??]
Geo wrote:[BTW, if you look at Hammond's comments in that thread there's something weird: the thread dates from '05, but Hammond's sig contains a quote from '08. In addition to all his other esteemable features does the guy *also* own a time machine??]