thomasec wrote:Article
eatchicago wrote:thomasec wrote:Article
Wait a second....Bari delivers to the Loop?!?!
How did I never know this?
MBK wrote:doug has great potential to expand and grow if he wants to; there is obvious demand for his product
eatchicago wrote:Wait a second....Bari delivers to the Loop?!?!
MBK wrote:doug has great potential to expand and grow if he wants to; there is obvious demand for his product
stevez wrote:MBK wrote:doug has great potential to expand and grow if he wants to; there is obvious demand for his product
Expansion and growth has never been a part of Doug's business plan. If it were, he'd open for dinner, which he has declined to do. I get the impression from talking to Doug on numerous occasions that he's happy with the business just the way it is.
But still, to start up this service, use Doug's name in the service's name and not even consult him before doing so was not a wise or considerate move -- and in spite of the disclaimers that they are not officially affiliated with Hot Doug's -- I'm guessing it's not legal, either.
Other than the extra strain the delivery service could potentially cause Hot Doug's, and all the implications of it, the use of the Hot Doug's name in the delivery service would be a big problem for me if I were the owner of Hot Doug's. Doug has spend a lot of time and energy creating a successful brand identity, and the potential for it to be tarnished by another service using my name, which I have no oversight or control over, would, to say the least, irk me. They could write as many disclaimers as they want that they're not affiliated, but I think there is real cause for concern over the dilution of a brand.
sundevilpeg wrote:
Poor Doug. Hope some sympathetic IP attorney reads this and helps him out pro bono. Good ones aren't cheap, and it's not at all fair that his livelihood is being compromised by Westlund and Michael.
ronnie_suburban wrote:
But why does Doug care if the messengers are making a profit? It's not like they're not doing something to earn it. In fact, at $1/order, I'm guessing that they're not making very much, if anything.
=R=
bnowell724 wrote:ronnie_suburban wrote:
But why does Doug care if the messengers are making a profit? It's not like they're not doing something to earn it. In fact, at $1/order, I'm guessing that they're not making very much, if anything.
=R=
The earlier poster said $1/ a sausage, not order. Could the delivery service charge that much without the preestablished customer base and perceived quality of Doug's brand-something he has spent a lot of work and time developing? I got the impression, from the article, that Doug is primarliy upset because the guys started this without his cooperation or knowledge.
Gapers Block wrote:Westlund said that the response to news of the service has been overwhelmingly positive, with people requesting drop locations in other neighborhoods around the city, such as Wicker Park. He shared that interest in Hot Doug Drop had him thinking about a broader "bike concierge" service that could deliver delicacies from a number of restaurants -- Kuma's Corner, for instance, which suffers from the same high demand-to-space ratio problems as Hot Doug's. If something along those lines ever develops, we'll let you know.
As for Sohn, he reiterated that he has "absolutely zero plans" to expand in any way. "The part that I like to do, I couldn't do if I were bigger or more that one or a larger kind of set-up. You know, it's the day-to-day, talking to the customers, making up prices as I go along -- you know, that aspect of the job, that's the part I like. And I would totally forfeit all of that if I were to change anything for the bigger."
Elfin wrote:Other press re Hot D's... last weeks 'The Onion'-the food reviewer said that the duck fat fries are over-rated and not worth the extra charge.
jimswside wrote:Elfin wrote:Other press re Hot D's... last weeks 'The Onion'-the food reviewer said that the duck fat fries are over-rated and not worth the extra charge.
to me they are worth it, and I thought they were better than the duckfat fries @ the Bristol
Elfin wrote:Other press re Hot D's... last weeks 'The Onion'-the food reviewer said that the duck fat fries are over-rated and not worth the extra charge.
gleam wrote:Elfin wrote:Other press re Hot D's... last weeks 'The Onion'-the food reviewer said that the duck fat fries are over-rated and not worth the extra charge.
I think it was a tough review. I saw the grade and was shocked, but I agreed with most of his points. I think the taste gets an A but the value gets a D+. The regular fries at Doug's are so good and less than half the price that it's just not worth it to me. That said, I also rarely go to HD on Friday or Saturday, anyway.
MBK wrote:duck fat fries might be worth the $1.25 extra but i don't think they're worth the 1.25 extra hour wait on weekends
Kennyz wrote:gleam wrote:Elfin wrote:Other press re Hot D's... last weeks 'The Onion'-the food reviewer said that the duck fat fries are over-rated and not worth the extra charge.
I think it was a tough review. I saw the grade and was shocked, but I agreed with most of his points. I think the taste gets an A but the value gets a D+. The regular fries at Doug's are so good and less than half the price that it's just not worth it to me. That said, I also rarely go to HD on Friday or Saturday, anyway.
I don't understand how it's possible for to give an A for taste and a D+ for value. Taste, in my opinion, is more than half of the value equation. If something gets an A for taste, it can get no worse than a B- for value, unless the prices are comically high, like $100 a sausage.
gleam wrote:The regular fries get an A for taste also. The duck fat fries, which aren't any better to me, are twice as much money. How does it not deserve a low grade for value?
gleam wrote:The regular fries get an A for taste also. The duck fat fries, which aren't any better to me, are twice as much money. How does it not deserve a low grade for value?