zim wrote:well, I guess that answers the question. I think what confuses me, is the fairly appetizing sandwich picture with the negative review. drool factor overwhelming normal brain workings. in hindi there's kind of a phrase for it ankhon ki bukh hunger of the eyes.
I had hoped to be finished with this whole matter, but I
will say that one of the most disappointing aspects of my sandwich was the meat. As it was implied above, the meat for my sandwich was listed on the menu board as "roast beef." So given, you can probably understand why I was taken aback when I saw the grillman throw some raw steakum-like meat on the flattop.
I would think that from the above photos, one might gather that the meat was of relatively low quality. And, while it is certainly not evident from the above photos, I can say that the meat
tasted like it was of low quality.
With these remarks behind me, I don't suppose that I should further concern myself with the paucity of meat on my sandwich, but I did feel that it skewed the balance of the ensemble. To my mind, the small serving of meat* essentially rendered it a french fry sandwich. Now, if you are simply in the market for booze blotter, these seemingly inordinate proportions of potatoes and bread clearly serve a purpose.
Regards,
Erik M.
* Doubling the serving of meat on any sandwich offered is a menu option, but the cost to do so is nearly half that of the original sandwich.