But we at Epicurious beg to differ [with Zagat]. Below we present our own analyses of some of Zagat's key findings.
TOP RATED AMONG MEGA CHAINS (more than 5,000 U.S. locations):
TOP FOOD
1. Wendy's [WINNER]
2. Subway
3. KFC
4. Taco Bell
5. Pizza Hut
Epicurious analysis: We like Subway for the simple reason that it bakes its own bread and lets you see the sandwichmakers making meals in front of your eyes. You can see the quality of the sliced meats, cheeses, and produce. So if the tomatoes look under-ripe, you can skip them. Plus, tacos, pizzas, fried chicken, and burgers can be greasy. Sandwiches, unless drenched in vinegar and oil, should not have this problem.
Santander wrote:http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/food/epicurious-differs-with-zagat-surveys-fast-food-findings-474492/Epicurious analysis: We like Subway for the simple reason that it bakes its own bread and lets you see the sandwichmakers making meals in front of your eyes. You can see the quality of the sliced meats, cheeses, and produce. So if the tomatoes look under-ripe, you can skip them. Plus, tacos, pizzas, fried chicken, and burgers can be greasy. Sandwiches, unless drenched in vinegar and oil, should not have this problem.
I think this earns seebee the right to go pelt both Epicurious and Zagat headquarters with congealed turkey loaf.
Epicurious analysis: We like Subway for the simple reason that it bakes its own bread and lets you see the sandwichmakers making meals in front of your eyes. You can see the quality of the sliced meats, cheeses, and produce....
Mike G wrote:I object to the use of the term "meat" when they mean "the food at Subway"
stevez wrote:Mike G wrote:I object to the use of the term "meat" when they mean "the food at Subway"
I object to the use of the words "the food at Subway" when they mean "Soylant Green".
sazerac wrote:stevez wrote:Mike G wrote:I object to the use of the term "meat" when they mean "the food at Subway"
I object to the use of the words "the food at Subway" when they mean "Soylant Green".
That's your opinion - but I think that taste varies from person to person
sazerac wrote:stevez wrote:Mike G wrote:I object to the use of the term "meat" when they mean "the food at Subway"
I object to the use of the words "the food at Subway" when they mean "Soylant Green".
That's your opinion - but I think that taste varies from person to person
Khaopaat wrote:Wow...I guess I'd better make sure all my immunizations are up to date before I order my next $5 foot-long
And that tells me all I need to know about you.
Geo wrote:On the Grand Scale of things, I'd risk (and have risked) contracting hep downing oysters and Jax at Acme Oyster House; but I'd not risk it (and never have) eating something (? ANYthing) at Subway.
That's my principle and I'm stickin' to it...
Geo
leek wrote:(italics, emphasis added)sazerac wrote:stevez wrote:
I object to the use of the words "the food at Subway" when they mean "Soylant Green".
That's your opinion - but I think that taste varies from person to person
And that tells me all I need to know about you.
Yep.elakin wrote:has anyone else noticed that the smell of subway's bread when it's baking is very similar to....puke?.
Khaopaat wrote:I really need to quit eating there...not because I think it's gross, but because the bastards that own the one in the Ogilvie station food court started excluding the Italian BMT from the $5 foot-long deal. May they get locked in a small room full of the smell of their own bread baking
Kennyz wrote:Subway is on a very short list of places at which I absolutely refuse to eat. The bread is gross and the meat is grosser. I'd rather eat a $5 foot than a $5 footlong.
I don't find Subway's meat to be all that different than any other crappy, store-brand, pre-packaged cold cuts.
When you are stuck somewhere with a handful of chains and not much else, Subway is fine.