Jamieson22 wrote:Wow, all the arguments that go around about lump vs briquette and someone who bbqs a bunch admits that they can't tell BBQ was made with propane![]()
abf005 wrote:Jamieson22 wrote:Wow, all the arguments that go around about lump vs briquette and someone who bbqs a bunch admits that they can't tell BBQ was made with propane![]()
Thats because gas & electric are only smoking with pure wood smoke, so the sooty tastes of lump and briquette are completly negated. In my experiance, its about as close to a wood only pit taste as one can get without a really big offset or a lot of brick.
Head's Red BBQ wrote:abf005 wrote:Jamieson22 wrote:Wow, all the arguments that go around about lump vs briquette and someone who bbqs a bunch admits that they can't tell BBQ was made with propane![]()
Thats because gas & electric are only smoking with pure wood smoke, so the sooty tastes of lump and briquette are completly negated. In my experiance, its about as close to a wood only pit taste as one can get without a really big offset or a lot of brick.
lump is wood..............
Jamieson22 wrote:
Wow, all the arguments that go around about lump vs briquette and someone who bbqs a bunch admits that they can't tell BBQ was made with propane
jimswside wrote:Jamieson22 wrote:
Wow, all the arguments that go around about lump vs briquette and someone who bbqs a bunch admits that they can't tell BBQ was made with propane
it is what it is, I can still tell the difference between bake-b-q, boil-b-q and the real thing though... so I think I am ok...![]()
In my research to find a smoker to allow me to do lazy-q, I have read up a bit on propane, and electric smokers, and most readings and sources have led me to believe a propane smoker can easily be mistook for a charcoal or wood fired product because thier is still a flame involved(even though it is a bastardized flame).![]()
I am just trying to keep an open mind about different smokers, and methods, I blame my need for a lazy-q smoker on NFL Sunday ticket, and the cold Chicago weather, it makes me want to spend less time on my deck, and more time on the couch all while still enjoying some bbq, especially since good bbq is so hard to find outside of a handfull of Chicago spots, that are too far for me to drive to on a regular basis.
Head's Red BBQ wrote:its all good but lump is far from impure..unless you get into some nasty brand like Cowboy where you can find old flooring, etc...
Head's Red BBQ wrote:[
That's because gas & electric are only smoking with pure wood smoke, so the sooty tastes of lump and briquette are completely negated. In my experience, its about as close to a wood only pit taste as one can get without a really big offset or a lot of brick.
Head's Red BBQ wrote:
i guess i just never understood the term "lazy Q"....
Head's Red BBQ wrote:jimswside wrote:Jamieson22 wrote:
Wow, all the arguments that go around about lump vs briquette and someone who bbqs a bunch admits that they can't tell BBQ was made with propane
it is what it is, I can still tell the difference between bake-b-q, boil-b-q and the real thing though... so I think I am ok...![]()
In my research to find a smoker to allow me to do lazy-q, I have read up a bit on propane, and electric smokers, and most readings and sources have led me to believe a propane smoker can easily be mistook for a charcoal or wood fired product because thier is still a flame involved(even though it is a bastardized flame).![]()
I am just trying to keep an open mind about different smokers, and methods, I blame my need for a lazy-q smoker on NFL Sunday ticket, and the cold Chicago weather, it makes me want to spend less time on my deck, and more time on the couch all while still enjoying some bbq, especially since good bbq is so hard to find outside of a handfull of Chicago spots, that are too far for me to drive to on a regular basis.
i guess i just never understood the term "lazy Q"....
abf005 wrote:Head's Red BBQ wrote:
that would be me sleeping soundly while you got up to check your fire! or switched out your propane tanks!
Head's Red BBQ wrote:I cant say the same for Cowboy where I have pulled out tongue and grove planks
jimswside wrote:Head's Red BBQ wrote:I cant say the same for Cowboy where I have pulled out tongue and grove planks
you probably run through alot more than I do so I can respect that accessment. I have only used maybe 15 bags of Cowboy(killing 2 birds with one stone @ Home Depot), and 15 bags of Royal Oak in the last few months. Before that it was all Royal Oak.
jimswside wrote:
In my research to find a smoker to allow me to do lazy-q, I have read up a bit on propane, and electric smokers, and most readings and sources have led me to believe a propane smoker can easily be mistook for a charcoal or wood fired product because thier is still a flame involved(even though it is a bastardized flame).![]()
Jamieson22 wrote:
Sounds like a WSM would be perfect for you. Ever heard of that smoker?
Fire up smoker at 10pm, put on 4 shoulders, go to bed at 10:45pm. Wake up at 9:30am, toss some coals in through access door, take off shoulders a few hours later. Sounds pretty lazy to me!
Head's Red BBQ wrote:Joel-ive stepped on many a hot coal ..not fun..glad to see you didnt waste any time putting that cooker to use!
I thought Wal-Mart had been running TV commercials lately saying all their beef is choice. Does this not apply to the brisket?Muttster wrote:was it graded - lots of time Wal-Mart will sell select instead of choice brisket. I believe I've even seen non-grade brisket there as well.
JoelF wrote:Well, the chicken came out terrific. Spot-on done in 1.5 hours, just like the book says, even with a downpour cooling down the cooker.
~snip~
I have to say, food is never so moist as it is coming off this wonderful black capsule.
Head's Red BBQ wrote:also royal oak comes from different points of origin...you have to look on the side of the bag..some from US..some from Canada and some from South America
again Cowboy will always be a good seller because like Kingsford its easy to find and ..its cheap
Head's Red BBQ wrote:Gary - I read on Naked Whiz Lump Database site that Nature Glo is a the restaurant version of Royal Oak and that its a bit better than the regular Royal Oak? not sure how true that is as far as being better quality...do you know anything in regards to that?
G Wiv wrote:Head's Red BBQ wrote:Gary - I read on Naked Whiz Lump Database site that Nature Glo is a the restaurant version of Royal Oak and that its a bit better than the regular Royal Oak? not sure how true that is as far as being better quality...do you know anything in regards to that?
Over the years I have purchased Royal Oak from Berger Bros in various packaging, Nature Glow, Royal Oak, even a plain brown 40-lb bag that simply said Lump Charcoal. Long as the underlying product is Royal Oak the quality has been consistently good. The Royal Oak lump I am currently using has English on one side, French on the other. I also feel that by getting my lump charcoal direct from the distributor* there is not as much dust/small pieces as it is not handled as much.
Enjoy,
Gary
*Berger Bros both sells retail and distributes to retail stores.