G Wiv wrote:gleam wrote:Has it occurred to you that maybe not everyone loves Patty's burger? Perhaps he's had it a few times and doesn't get the hype.
Ed,
You use of hype implies you don't think Patty's is a particularly delicious burger. On that I disagree.
foodmex wrote:Did you really think majority of the Chicago Magazine readers are going to trek to Skokie to have the best hamburger?
dropkickjeffy wrote:Hey folks. Jeff Ruby here. Thrilled to see you discussing the burger feature. I put a lot of time and effort into it, but of course, in the end, it's just another man's opinion.
There was no political motivation for any of it, other than to try and get a variety of styles, areas, and levels of complexity. No one ever told me what to include or what not to include. I had no agenda whatsoever - at least none that I was aware of - other than to cover as much ground as possible and have fun with the writing.
As for repeat visits: you're killing me. I did the whole thing myself and ate burgers basically all summer so even with one visit per place, I could not possibly cover the kind of ground that would satisfy everyone. I am only one man, and this is far from scientific. As someone (I think it was BR) pointed out, not all of these places are necessarily consistent. I loved Cortland's when I went, but lord only knows how it would have fared the next night. Take that for what it's worth.
Why no Patty's? Aaron Deacon wins the prize. I had heard rumors that the place was not long for this earth, and the last thing I wanted to do was anoint a place as one of the best only to see it close in the meantime. I'm glad I was wrong, and it's still open. I took a chance on That's-A-Burger, which was having problems with its landlord, and that has been nerve-wracking enough.
Anything else? My psyche is about as fragile as boulder. Take your best shot.
Best,
Jeff
David Hammond wrote:Thanks for throwing your hat in this particular ring, Jeff, and for confirming what is pretty clear to many of us, which is that there's no way there's a conspiracy afoot to undermine all the really good burger places and that this review, like just about all others, is based on one person's experience and likely not multiple visits to all places reviewed.
Darren72 wrote:David Hammond wrote:Thanks for throwing your hat in this particular ring, Jeff, and for confirming what is pretty clear to many of us, which is that there's no way there's a conspiracy afoot to undermine all the really good burger places and that this review, like just about all others, is based on one person's experience and likely not multiple visits to all places reviewed.
Gotta love the fact that this had to be said!
dropkickjeffy wrote:As for Skokie, Josh is right. I always assumed our average reader was a 48-year-old woman living on the North Shore. I am none of those things
dropkickjeffy wrote:I love conspiracies more than anyone else. I have always wanted to be a part of one. This, alas, ain't it.
As for Skokie, Josh is right. I always assumed our average reader was a 48-year-old woman living on the North Shore. I am none of those things, so it's amazing that I've managed to hang on to my job for 12 years.
Jeff
stevez wrote:dropkickjeffy wrote:I love conspiracies more than anyone else. I have always wanted to be a part of one. This, alas, ain't it.
As for Skokie, Josh is right. I always assumed our average reader was a 48-year-old woman living on the North Shore. I am none of those things, so it's amazing that I've managed to hang on to my job for 12 years.
Jeff
Jeff,
I really enjoyed the Burgers Made Me Dumb piece, too. I just figured that's why Patty's wasn't on the list.Like Gary, I'm looking forward to my maiden visit to Flub a Dub Chub. All in all, it's a good list, though there are a couple I question and a couple that I would have replaced them with. Of course, I'm sure everyone you meet will pretty much say that.
dropkickjeffy wrote:Hey folks. Jeff Ruby here. Thrilled to see you discussing the burger feature. I put a lot of time and effort into it, but of course, in the end, it's just another man's opinion.
There was no political motivation for any of it, other than to try and get a variety of styles, areas, and levels of complexity. No one ever told me what to include or what not to include. I had no agenda whatsoever - at least none that I was aware of - other than to cover as much ground as possible and have fun with the writing.
As for repeat visits: you're killing me. I did the whole thing myself and ate burgers basically all summer so even with one visit per place, I could not possibly cover the kind of ground that would satisfy everyone. I am only one man, and this is far from scientific. As someone (I think it was BR) pointed out, not all of these places are necessarily consistent. I loved Cortland's when I went, but lord only knows how it would have fared the next night. Take that for what it's worth.
Why no Patty's? Aaron Deacon wins the prize. I had heard rumors that the place was not long for this earth, and the last thing I wanted to do was anoint a place as one of the best only to see it close in the meantime. I'm glad I was wrong, and it's still open. I took a chance on That's-A-Burger, which was having problems with its landlord, and that has been nerve-wracking enough.
Anything else? My psyche is about as fragile as boulder. Take your best shot.
Best,
Jeff
BR wrote:dropkickjeffy wrote:Hey folks. Jeff Ruby here. Thrilled to see you discussing the burger feature. I put a lot of time and effort into it, but of course, in the end, it's just another man's opinion.
There was no political motivation for any of it, other than to try and get a variety of styles, areas, and levels of complexity. No one ever told me what to include or what not to include. I had no agenda whatsoever - at least none that I was aware of - other than to cover as much ground as possible and have fun with the writing.
As for repeat visits: you're killing me. I did the whole thing myself and ate burgers basically all summer so even with one visit per place, I could not possibly cover the kind of ground that would satisfy everyone. I am only one man, and this is far from scientific. As someone (I think it was BR) pointed out, not all of these places are necessarily consistent. I loved Cortland's when I went, but lord only knows how it would have fared the next night. Take that for what it's worth.
Why no Patty's? Aaron Deacon wins the prize. I had heard rumors that the place was not long for this earth, and the last thing I wanted to do was anoint a place as one of the best only to see it close in the meantime. I'm glad I was wrong, and it's still open. I took a chance on That's-A-Burger, which was having problems with its landlord, and that has been nerve-wracking enough.
Anything else? My psyche is about as fragile as boulder. Take your best shot.
Best,
Jeff
Very well stated. And of course, as I'm sure you already know, burger debates stir up a lot of emotions. But I'm curious about how many burgers you tried which didn't make the list. With all of that burger eating, I'm sure you must have tried some that you just wanted to throw on the floor.
dropkickjeffy wrote:Yeah, Pang told me about the Labriola burger after the fact. Would have loved to have tried that one for the piece. It looks amazing.
Santander, I tried Goldyburgers and I'm convinced it's a case of people's memories tricking them into thinking it's great. It's such a charming place, but really, is there anything special about those burgers? Not that I experienced.
BR: How many did I eat that didn't make the cut? I honestly lost track. I kept notes on the ones that deserved it, and that was about 70 burgers. But there were so many duds - even among the places that were highly recommended.
gleam wrote:G Wiv wrote:gleam wrote:Has it occurred to you that maybe not everyone loves Patty's burger? Perhaps he's had it a few times and doesn't get the hype.
Ed,
You use of hype implies you don't think Patty's is a particularly delicious burger. On that I disagree.
My use of the word "hype" implies that the burger gets a lot of hype on this forum, on par with Doug's foie gras dog. I didn't intend any negative or positive connotation. I've never had the burger.
My point is that reasonable people can disagree about whether a particular dish is tasty or not, and often do. It's absurd to suggest that a restaurant is being excluded from the list because Chicago mag readers don't want to go to scary and far-away Skokie, as foodmex suggested here:foodmex wrote:Did you really think majority of the Chicago Magazine readers are going to trek to Skokie to have the best hamburger?
Where is our Hot Doug of hamburgers to raise the standard and wrap lines around the block with freshly griddled, Wilshire-and-Sepulveda-by-way-of-Ponca-City classic American burgers?
I tried Miner-Dunn on my way to Michigan earlier this month and both my girlfriend and I both really liked their burgers, fries, and sherbert. Definitely recommended.gleam wrote:So I have a rare reason to be in NWI (Hammond, but we'll drive for food) on Saturday, and my wife is cravin' burgers. She's a big fan of Top Notch, so what's my best bet for a 30's to 50's style burger in the region? Johnsen's Blue Top? One of the Schoop's locations? Miner-Dunn?
Anything else we should check out?
So I have a rare reason to be in NWI (Hammond, but we'll drive for food) on Saturday, and my wife is cravin' burgers. She's a big fan of Top Notch, so what's my best bet for a 30's to 50's style burger in the region? Johnsen's Blue Top? One of the Schoop's locations? Miner-Dunn?