seebee wrote:Well, does she drive a Cadillac Kyoop De Ville while having a nice bowl of chicken noodle syoop with a dollop of grey pyoopon mustard on the way to pick up your brand new tyoopee since you've started balding?
seebee wrote: I'm really wondering how the big guy is getting twice the price, or if they HAVE to charge that much for some reason?
Khaopaat wrote:seebee wrote:Well, does she drive a Cadillac Kyoop De Ville while having a nice bowl of chicken noodle syoop with a dollop of grey pyoopon mustard on the way to pick up your brand new tyoopee since you've started balding?
You're freakin' me out, man! I was composing a sentence just like this one in my head, using many of the same words, while I typed my response to Pie Lady...I came up with "Check out that dyoochebag in the Kyoop De Ville - his tyoopée just flew off!"
Cynthia wrote:seebee wrote: I'm really wondering how the big guy is getting twice the price, or if they HAVE to charge that much for some reason?
Having had family members in "the business" (selling to stores, rather than running the stores), the answer they ran into is yes, they most definitely have to charge that much --to cover the cost of all the other stuff they have to carry. The little guy has a few items and most of it moves pretty quickly, because he can guess what his clientele wants. People expect the larger grocery stores to have everything...
Pie Lady wrote:
How did you not slap the woman grazing donuts for her kid?
mchodera wrote:6.) The store grosses $1.65M a week already.
Cynthia wrote:seebee wrote: I'm really wondering how the big guy is getting twice the price, or if they HAVE to charge that much for some reason?
Having had family members in "the business" (selling to stores, rather than running the stores), the answer they ran into is yes, they most definitely have to charge that much --to cover the cost of all the other stuff they have to carry. The little guy has a few items and most of it moves pretty quickly, because he can guess what his clientele wants. People expect the larger grocery stores to have everything -- seasonal items, such as garden supplies or Halloween costumes, cards, magazines, hair color, shampoo, and so on -- plus all the things that outdate and have to be tossed, which not only includes all the food products, but also all the OTC medicines and vitamins, energy bars, diet drinks, a garden center, fresh flowers, beer, and so on, and then, in the food section, they're expected to have some organic offerings, as well as the regular stuff, a few obscure vegetables, such as celeriac, ethnic foods, health foods, deli items, prepared foods, a full bakery -- you get the idea. The little guy doesn't need to bear that immense burden. Also, a smaller store can more easily monitor such activities as shop-lifting and "casual grazing" (I can't tell you how often I've seen people open a box of donuts, hand one to a crying child, and then put the box back on the shelf). They earn just pennies on any given item they sell -- and the "loss leaders," as the names suggests, lose them money (but, it is hoped, draw in customers, who will buy, they hope, something other than those heavily discounted items). On top of that, if something isn't selling, they have to get rid of it, and as much as I love the "clearance" rack (I've found some unbelievable discounts even in the liquor department -- wine marked down from $10 to $2), I also realize that is another hit to the bottom line.
And with a lot of the big stores, you're also paying to keep them open 24-hours a day. When I pop into a Jewel after midnight, there are often more employees than customers -- and there aren't a lot of employees -- but they're still open.
So ultimately, you're paying for convenience -- not just the odd hours, but the wide range of goods. For people who are not recreational shoppers (and as hard as it is to imagine, those people do exist), the value lies in being able to get everything in one place -- liquor, flowers, chocolates, and birthday card, as well as hair conditioner, mascara, and dinner.
You might want to do some price-checking at Target. I get most of my dry goods from there if I can. (Due to a small house and household I don't belong to Costco or Sams, and I just don't like Wal-Mart, so those stores were out for me.) I had a spreadsheet going for a few months that I used to do price comparisons and it was eye-opening.Pie Lady wrote:But what about canned, jarred, and boxed items and housewares like garbage bags and dish soap? Jewel usually has some pretty good deals, has a ton of selection, and takes coupons. I always had the mindset that Jewel is better for that kind of thing. Have I been wrong all this time? Thanks for the help...
I am not sure the big chains actually have all that much better buying power and do have the curse of slotting fees, which are legalized kickbacks.
rickster wrote:I am not sure the big chains actually have all that much better buying power and do have the curse of slotting fees, which are legalized kickbacks.
Not sure what this means. Slotting fees are paid by manufacturers to the chains in order to get their products shelved, so it should improve the store's profits.
ekreider wrote:RallyMike gets the economics of slotting fees almost right. Manufacturers get back the fees by higher prices to stores that charge the fees. The secondary effect is that profitability of a product is partially due to the slotting fee and partially due to sales. Hence there is a real risk that the product mix is less than optimal from a sales point of view. Supplier kickbacks, legal or otherwise, lower sales because they keep products on the shelves that should not be there and keep other products off the shelves.
ekreider wrote:The secondary effect is that profitability of a product is partially due to the slotting fee and partially due to sales. Hence there is a real risk that the product mix is less than optimal from a sales point of view. Supplier kickbacks, legal or otherwise, lower sales because they keep products on the shelves that should not be there and keep other products off the shelves.
RallyMike gets the economics of slotting fees almost right. Manufacturers get back the fees by higher prices to stores that charge the fees. The secondary effect is that profitability of a product is partially due to the slotting fee and partially due to sales. Hence there is a real risk that the product mix is less than optimal from a sales point of view. Supplier kickbacks, legal or otherwise, lower sales because they keep products on the shelves that should not be there and keep other products off the shelves.