Kennyz wrote:jimswside wrote:btw I also enjoy the bar area @ Frontera, but then again I love tequila, and checking out the bottles on hand
Next time you're there, ask for Gerardo if he's not the one already taking care of you. The man is passionate about his tequila, and really seems to know his stuff. On his recommendation, I finished last night's meal with this:
Apparently, Casa Noble is the first tequila maker to try single-barrel aging, and they use charred French oak barrels. This single barrel Añejo was incredibly rich and smoky, with significant vanilla and caramel notes. It was really special.
shadesofjay wrote:Can anyone lend some insight into what the wait may be like at Frontera Grill on Friday around 8pm? I'll add it'll be this Friday, before the long weekend so I'm hoping it will be a little LESS crowded than usual. It's before any tourists make it in and hopefully some natives are already gone. Maybe that's just wishful thinking.
-J
shadesofjay wrote:Can anyone lend some insight into what the wait may be like at Frontera Grill on Friday around 8pm? I'll add it'll be this Friday, before the long weekend so I'm hoping it will be a little LESS crowded than usual. It's before any tourists make it in and hopefully some natives are already gone. Maybe that's just wishful thinking.
-J
What do you mean by "the waiting area"? If you mean the bar, why didn't you just sit down and eat?Chitown B wrote:tried to go last night, at 5:45, on a Thursday. Almost no one waiting in the waiting area. Was quoted 2 hours for 2 people. WTF? They barely even accept reservations. That can't be right. Needless to say we left, and hit Hub 51.
Chitown B wrote:I don't know, there was a small couch next to the front desk people were sitting on. We were not offered any seat at the bar or told that was an option. We've never been there before. We were basically told it would be 2 hours. And we had a concert in 2 hours so we couldn't wait.
teatpuller wrote: You cannot sit at the tables surrounding the bar which are now part of the "restaurant." It's all very confusing.
Kennyz wrote:teatpuller wrote: You cannot sit at the tables surrounding the bar which are now part of the "restaurant." It's all very confusing.
Ouch. That's a big and disappointing change from the way things were just a few weeks ago, and for as long as I've been a Frontera customer.
Kennyz wrote:Chitown B wrote:I don't know, there was a small couch next to the front desk people were sitting on. We were not offered any seat at the bar or told that was an option. We've never been there before. We were basically told it would be 2 hours. And we had a concert in 2 hours so we couldn't wait.
It just so happens there is a bar about 10 feet away from where you were standing. That's probably where all the people making up that 2 hour wait were, and where you might have been able to snag 2 seats and have dinner. Next time.
Chitown B wrote:Kennyz wrote:Chitown B wrote:I don't know, there was a small couch next to the front desk people were sitting on. We were not offered any seat at the bar or told that was an option. We've never been there before. We were basically told it would be 2 hours. And we had a concert in 2 hours so we couldn't wait.
It just so happens there is a bar about 10 feet away from where you were standing. That's probably where all the people making up that 2 hour wait were, and where you might have been able to snag 2 seats and have dinner. Next time.
thanks, but for our first time at a place I don't want to sit on a bar stool. Especially when we had tons of time for a nice dinner, but just not 2 hours to wait before we even started. Oh well.
Darren72 wrote:Chitown B wrote:Kennyz wrote:The bar area has regular seats. If teatpuller is right, these seats are no longer available. Otherwise, these bar tables were first come, first served.
In any case, the lesson for next time is that you can't go during dinner and expect not to wait. You can go very early, as someone else said, or do what I do and go for lunch.
I can't help think of something you wrote in the Great Lake thread: "How dare this place be busy? We are the only ones that know about the article!! Serve us now!"
Darren72 wrote:The bar area has regular seats. If teatpuller is right, these seats are no longer available. Otherwise, these bar tables were first come, first served.
Chitown B wrote:They are much much more capable of large crowd control yet they really had no reason to give us such a huge wait estimate for two people. They don't even really take reservations, so it wasn't like all those seats were taken. A couple were, but not all.
teatpuller wrote:Chitown B wrote:They are much much more capable of large crowd control yet they really had no reason to give us such a huge wait estimate for two people. They don't even really take reservations, so it wasn't like all those seats were taken. A couple were, but not all.
They stagger the seating. The kitchen can't handle 65 (or more) orders all at the same time.
Matt wrote:Darren72 wrote:The bar area has regular seats. If teatpuller is right, these seats are no longer available. Otherwise, these bar tables were first come, first served.
As of a week ago, the bar tables that are at regular table level, with regular chairs (across from the bar) are reserved seating (i.e., not first come, first served). The handful of high-top tables are still first come, first served. The formal bar itself and the other along-the-wall counters with stools also remain first come, first served.
What, do you think they just didn't like the way you looked? See above: there is a big bar which you missed. That's where the people were waiting.Chitown B wrote:The place seats 65, not 12, and there was no one there waiting, ... they really had no reason to give us such a huge wait estimate for two people.
Chitown B wrote:I think that's a bad idea. I don't care about waiting a bit longer to order, but I could sit at a nice table and get drinks for awhile while I waited. I wasn't even offered that.
Kennyz wrote:Matt wrote:What, do you think they just didn't like the way you looked? See above: there is a big bar which you missed. That's where the people were waiting.Chitown B wrote:The place seats 65, not 12, and there was no one there waiting, ... they really had no reason to give us such a huge wait estimate for two people.
teatpuller wrote:Chitown B wrote:I think that's a bad idea. I don't care about waiting a bit longer to order, but I could sit at a nice table and get drinks for awhile while I waited. I wasn't even offered that.
I'm not defending the way they do business. It is kind of convoluted if you ask me, but trust me, everyone gets treated the same way there. My FIL tried to slip them a $50 one time and it was refused.
Kennyz wrote:I was going to say something about how unlikely it is that they told you the wait was 2 hours if there was really no one waiting, just to get you to go somewhere else. But who knows, I'm sure that does happen to certain people sometimes, so I'm sorry to doubt you.
Darren72 wrote:Kennyz wrote:I was going to say something about how unlikely it is that they told you the wait was 2 hours if there was really no one waiting, just to get you to go somewhere else. But who knows, I'm sure that does happen to certain people sometimes, so I'm sorry to doubt you.
Well, if you won't, I will. I think it is amazing that you presume that there really wasn't anyone waiting and yet they told you the wait would be two hours. I wasn't there so I don't know what happened. But I can think of a lot of reasons why there really was a two hour wait.
Whether Great Lake has 12 seats or 200 is immaterial. The point is that popular places that do not take reservations have long waits. Just as you were amazed that people thought they could get a seat quicker at Great Lake, I'm amazed that you thought the same thing at one of the most popular restaurants in the country.
No, you'd think that.Chitown B wrote:I'll be back, but you'd think 5:45 PM on a Thursday would be one of the easiest times to get a table for dinner.