gooseberry wrote:...what Chicago *really* needs, IMHO, is:
a) Some kind of sit-down restaurant serving Keralan cuisine (ie not just a caterer)
b) Any place, of any kind (even food-cart!) serving Goan cuisine
c) Any place, of any kind, serving Parsi cuisine (preferably Parsi wedding-style food

d) Any place, of any kind, serving Sri Lankan cuisine
Heck, one of the above would make me very very happy...
c8w, I'm with you. South Indian and Punjabi type food are predominant in Chicago. I'm tired of the same boring standardized "indian" food everywhere and "curry" whatever the heck that is supposed to be. I would imagine this situation is analogous to the Chinese or Mexican food scene in the U.S. of the 1970's. Homestyle regional indian cuisine would be pleasant. At least there are some Gujarati places available. One can only wrangle a finite number of wedding or dinner invitations! I've started trying to prepare some regional food at home.
Yes. Heck, there are hardly any Gujarati places to start with - and there are tens of thousands of Gujarati's in Chicago (they own half the restaurants on Devon, for a start

Yet, I cant think of a single "Gujarati restaurant" as such (maybe Big Suchir - a grocery store; and Rasoi - mostly catering, IIRC).
The "analogous to the Chinese or Mexican food scene of the 70s" is spot on IMHO - what we have is sort of generic "North Indian food" (not even a *real* Punjab-style place, I cant think of one authentically Punjabi restaurant anywhere in Chicago, with good sarson-ka-saag and makke-di-roti plus butter chicken etc... and no, please please dont say "Bhabis"

What we have in Chicago is a sort of "Generic North Indian Mughlai food", curry-dominated, mostly non-vegetarian; and we have the generic South Indian food (Udipi, Mysore Woodlands - both authentic enough, but entirely focussed on vegetarian South Inidan food - essentially the food of Tamil Nadu and maybe parts of Mysore). Geographically Goa might count as Southern India (non-vegetarian and Porguese-influenced), and is unique; Kerala and Andhra definitely counts as Southern India, and both there are strongly non-vegetarian South Indian food (this is meat-based Indian food that is as different from Khan's meat-based, say, as French food is from Italian, and this entire category basically doesnt exist in Chicago).
These are the glaring things missing in Chicago IMHO - a city like London too used to be dominated by "Mughlai-style" Indian food a decade ago, probably, but it now much more varied with regional-style Indian food... there are probably more than a half-dozen Keralan restaurants in London alone, not to mention a few Goan-style places. In Chicago we have no Goan food of any kind; Andhra food consists of one surviving branch of Sizzle India (which concentrates heavily on vegetarian and Chinese to survive), and 1 catering spot IIRC; Keralan is just one catering spot (Royal Malabar - which, BTW, is offering a banquet-Thanksgiving-meal for 20 or some such.. with such traditional Thanksgiving favourites as Turkey, Avial, Mashed Potatoes and Gravy, Thoran, Dressing, Beef Fry, and, I think, Kingfish Curry
These are all styles of cuisine that IMHO *should* have a representation in Chicago - and could actually succeed if they do, maybe more so than another generic "North Indian restaurant" would.
Well, except for maybe the Parsi food thing - that was mostly just a personal hope, because it can be pretty damn awesome.. but I know we'll never really see a Parsi restaurant in Chicago in my lifetime

c8w