riddlemay wrote:An alternative would be for me to start a different thread for all of us Bagel-fanciers (and all those who have some fondness for the place on some level), with a positive thread title to match, and I can certainly do that, but I thought I'd make this request of you first.
riddlemay wrote:... the only thing that continues to trouble me is the subject heading you gave this thread.
Darren72 wrote:... and a thread for people who have strongly held opinions but haven't yet made it to the restaurant.
mrbarolo wrote:...While I never intended "contempt" as a permanent, sweeping condemnation of all things Bagel, harsh as it may seem, it did reflect my response to that incident---that moment---when a counterman at a deli refused to put mustard on a CB on rye, then added injury to insult by failing to provide even the promised packets. At, and for, that moment, I felt contempt.
Should such a [positive] thread appear, I will even return to the Bagel, take a table, order up some specialties and with all good will attempt to pluck out the heart of its mystery, that I may contribute to the more positive thread: "Rugalach Heights?" "Blintz and Blintzability?"
Amata wrote:riddlemay wrote:... the only thing that continues to trouble me is the subject heading you gave this thread.
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a witty poster in possession of a dry sandwich, must be in want of a scolding.
aschie30 wrote:Amata wrote:riddlemay wrote:... the only thing that continues to trouble me is the subject heading you gave this thread.
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a witty poster in possession of a dry sandwich, must be in want of a scolding.
Well done. {One of the wittiest, tongue-in-cheek opening lines in British literature, IMO.}
riddlemay wrote:I'm just starting to get that there's an Austen thing going on in the thread title and in Amata's comment; give me a demerit in the cultural literacy department. But for the record, my request for a less vituperative thread title wasn't a scolding--it was a request. Other readers as woefully illiterate as I am may not get the joke, in which case the joke would be on The Bagel.
aschie30 wrote:riddlemay wrote:I'm just starting to get that there's an Austen thing going on in the thread title and in Amata's comment; give me a demerit in the cultural literacy department. But for the record, my request for a less vituperative thread title wasn't a scolding--it was a request. Other readers as woefully illiterate as I am may not get the joke, in which case the joke would be on The Bagel.
You're right; from here on out, we should proceed on the assumption that people will read only the thread titles and not the thread itself.
As for your "request," riddlemay, I think Mrbarolo responded to it above - he declined.
and a thread for people who have strongly held opinions but haven't yet made it to the restaurant.
That's not just a new thread, that's a whole new permanent board. A brilliant paradigm-shifting innovation.
That's not just a new thread, that's a whole new permanent board. A brilliant paradigm-shifting innovation.Darren72 wrote:...a thread for people who have strongly held opinions but haven't yet made it to the restaurant.
Well, if that's what you want. Surely the Kuma's well hasn't run dry after only 9,000,000,000 posts; my work here is done. I shall head over there and begin heaping contumely upon them. That should get me ridden out of town on a pretzel bun.Kennyz wrote:I'm suddenly longing for more threads about fast food burger joints.
mrbarolo wrote:Of course, everyone should eat at Toons. Great food, great prices, and an atmosphere awash in mensch-keit. (Awkward, I know, but how often do you get even an lame attempt at a Yiddish neologism these days?)
Ah well. I'll revise this to Elizabeth and Mr. Collins then.mrbarolo wrote:Grits: I fear the Bagel and I will never be Elizabeth and Darcy. We're sliding sadly toward something gloomy, twisted, even Strindbergian. We're like 2 scorpions in a pickle barrel now.