It was a critical butter emergency. Not involving Marlon Brando, just regular baking/cooking.MKL wrote:Try Dean's brand
grits wrote:Is this why the shape of the box changed? I ended up buying the organic butter on my last TJ run because that box fits better in my fridge. Don't really feel a pressing need for organic butter so I was irritated by this.
grits wrote:It was a critical butter emergency. Not involving Marlon Brando, just regular baking/cooking.MKL wrote:Try Dean's brand
The new TJ's packaging looks like 4 sticks but flat packed. into a rectangle. Is this the western packaging?stevez wrote:There are only two shapes for butter commonly used in the USA. East of the Rockies, you'll generally see Elgin packaging, in which the sticks are slightly longer and skinnier than the Western packaging used on the west coast, in which the sticks of butter are more squat. Regardless of shape, a stick of butter is 1/4 lb. The packaging for a pound of Western pack butter is more cubical than a pound of Elgin pack butter.grits wrote:Is this why the shape of the box changed? I ended up buying the organic butter on my last TJ run because that box fits better in my fridge. Don't really feel a pressing need for organic butter so I was irritated by this.
grits wrote:The new TJ's packaging looks like 4 sticks but flat packed. into a rectangle. Is this the western packaging?
stevez wrote:There are only two shapes for butter commonly used in the USA. East of the Rockies, you'll generally see Elgin packaging, in which the sticks are slightly longer and skinnier than the Western packaging used on the west coast, in which the sticks of butter are more squat. Regardless of shape, a stick of butter is 1/4 lb. The packaging for a pound of Western pack butter is more cubical than a pound of Elgin pack butter.
mbh wrote:Who knew that! Thank you for the info.
happy_stomach wrote:stevez wrote:There are only two shapes for butter commonly used in the USA. East of the Rockies, you'll generally see Elgin packaging, in which the sticks are slightly longer and skinnier than the Western packaging used on the west coast, in which the sticks of butter are more squat. Regardless of shape, a stick of butter is 1/4 lb. The packaging for a pound of Western pack butter is more cubical than a pound of Elgin pack butter.mbh wrote:Who knew that! Thank you for the info.
Apparently, stevez! Thanks from me, too. I didn't know about the geographical divide or the packaging terms. I prefer blocks of butter, but if I have to choose sticks, my aesthetic preference is for the squatter, western butter. Now I have to use this new information for food trivia something...
MikeLM wrote:khm:
I have a package from the old TJ butter, rescued from the recycle.
The numbers on two of the end-flaps are PO3U3287.
Does that sound like the mfg's code?
Another flap has 0369-00-0043-00 It's different from the barcode. Does that help?
Printed on the face of the carton is 11P7 10 230744
BH#1 187 U4:46
Somehow, In don't think they want the consumer to understand.
That's all the nuimbers I can find. Hope it helps
If it does, please let us know the secret.
Mike
The one that labelled "Sweet Cream Butter" is salted. The one labelled "Unsalted" is not. Little bit of cognitive dissonance with the sweet cream/salted thing.khm99 wrote:I did go back to TJ's and purchased #1 of the organic butter, which does appear to be more like the butter I grew to know and love...it's salted, though....
The flat pack for the non-organic butter is a recent change.aschie30 wrote:I'm a little confused. The good butter (which was discontinued) was made by Humboldt Creamery, which is in California. So was it "flat-packed" into a rectangle (ie, Western-style)?
grits wrote:The flat pack for the non-organic butter is a recent change.aschie30 wrote:I'm a little confused. The good butter (which was discontinued) was made by Humboldt Creamery, which is in California. So was it "flat-packed" into a rectangle (ie, Western-style)?
aschie30 wrote:And, yes, I second teatpuller's question as to who manufactured the inferior butter.
razbry wrote:what I want to know is why butter (in general) is so dang expensive!
razbry wrote:what I want to know is why butter (in general) is so dang expensive!
gleam wrote:razbry wrote:what I want to know is why butter (in general) is so dang expensive!
It takes about 2.5 gallons of milk to make one pound of butter. When you compare the cost of a pound of butter to the cost of a gallon of milk, it seems to be a bargain.