Paul SL wrote:given the millions of Latin American choices in and around LA, I doubt if they'd appreciate the subtle variations of our Mexican food, so I'm going to table that one for now.
I wouldn't be so sure. Los Angeles has some good regional Mexican cuisine, but a lot of Angelenos are simply not aware of it (unless they browse boards like LTH). I know my relatives in L.A. were not aware of Mexican options there that I uncovered on similar boards. (I'm sure many non-foodie types here in Chicago aren't aware of our creative provincial Mexican options, with the exception of the Bayless restaurants.)
happy_stomach wrote:Have you been to Animal? I wouldn't put Sable anywhere near the same category. The food at the former is much more snout-to-tail, richer, funkier, more daring, and it's not a cocktail place.
Yes, I ate at Animal not too long ago. I loved it, but I would not describe it as you do. It's very much a loud casual bistro/brasserie type restaurant (like Sable) where people like to drink as well as eat (like Sable), which has delicious creative contemporary food (like Sable). I would have a hard time describing Animal as "richer, funkier and more daring" than Sable, since both lean in that same direction (with Sable's bison short ribs sliders with root beer glaze and Animal's foie gras with biscuit and maple sausage gravy, both simply fantastic dishes based on rich foods in funky preparations). And I wouldn't describe Sable as strictly "a cocktail place", either; yes, they have craft cocktails too, but anyone can go there just for the food - Heather Terhune's food is so good that it stands on its own without having to consider the cocktail angle. Clearly your opinion differs, but that's what I thought, based on eating at both places (both of which I enjoyed A LOT).
The main reason I mentioned Sable, though, is the affordability of the food, given the OP's stated budget constraint. And the food at Animal, while fairly priced, was not the unusual bargain that it is at Sable.
trpt2345 wrote:It's funny, I lived in LA for six months a while back and the Mexican food there was horrible. I mean awful. Asadero is way better than any place I ate in East LA or Boyle Heights or anywhere else for that matter. I don't know what it is, there's plenty of Mexicans there but oy, the food.
I travel to L.A. occasionally, thanks to relatives there, and as noted above, I recently identified a bunch of regional Mexican restaurants there. The only one I tried since doing so was Moles La Tia in Boyle Heights, but I liked it a lot - not as much as Mundial or Mixteco or Mexique here, but they do a very nice job particularly with their variety of moles. Certainly not horrible IMHO.