Deesher,
Speaking of wines that sometimes we have some concerns that they might not live forever.
A few days ago I drank, with a lot of reluctance since I was tempted to keep it for another milestone, a bottle of 1985 Chateau Lafite-Rothschild that my brother gave me for my 70th birthday.
This bottle was kept in his 18th century old cellar dug in a mix of chalk and limestone under his house in the middle of the Champagne vineyards since he bought it in 1987. As you know 1985 was a very charming and seductive vintage in the Medoc but never reached the heights of the 1982 or the 1986.
Since the wine level, the label, the cap which was perfectly dry, and the cork were in perfect shape, I expected to go through an orgasmic moment. I decanted it and there was very little sediment at the bottom. But when I poured I immediately supected judging by the shade of its color and its slightly brownish orange hue, that this wine was perhaps past its prime time.
But the nose was still spectacular.
It turned out to be very elegant and refined the way a Lafite should be, but the body had lost part of its strength and obviously it would have been a big mistake to delay its "degustation" any longer. Buk I do not have, like you, 9 more bottles to check out the real longevity of that type of wine.
I was much more impressed with the Petrus 94 I drank the week before in Paris. It was a pure moment of intensity and joy. But perhaps, in this case, 5 more years in the bottle would have made it the experience of a life time.