Well, it seems like the best way to log forum feedback to Mado sans Allie and Rob is to start a new thread. If the moderators disagree, ok. But the new place is different in chef and in concept, in ambition and in tone.
We live very nearby and have been longtime regulars at the old Mado, which we have cherished for its clean, bright flavors and deceptively simple preparations and presentations. It is perhaps inevitable that we'd be somewhat disappointed in the new place. But we went with open minds, and we will go back. Nonetheless, we have a number of disappointments to report.
As chronicled here and at Grub Street et al, the turn over was fast. That likely accounts for some missteps like the paint colors, which are sorely ill-advised in both the dining room (shrekish, cheap chartreuse that terribly clashes with the exposed brick and the cherry leather chairs leftover) and the bathroom (slaughterhouse red, not a good way to memorialize the craft of butchery that used to reside here). As well the new waitstaff has a much fussier aura (too much airy pumping of the menu, too much checking in to see how every course was). But these are the less important points.
Much more important is the food. Baltzley is clearly ambitious, and the idea is much more involved than the original Mado. Last night there were, I think, 6 small plates, 3 salads, 2 pastas, 6 entrees, and 3 desserts. Notably, nothing that I recall emphasized the pedigree or provenance of the veg, proteins etc. So locavorism doesn't seem to be part of the angle.
We had a beet salad, which was truly beautiful in presentation. The beets were cubed, and arranged on a rectangular plate with a few clusters of beet greens (shredded, wilted, and salted); a few microsprouts; pickled beet stems; and dots of a puree described as beet and (I think) turnip. Pretty, precious, and decently tasty. Interesting that the greens and the stems and the beets were all present in some application.
Next was a scallop app, with cauliflower puree, pickled radishes, and cocoa butter. The two scallops were quite large (it was quite generous for $12), and really very briny. They were perfectly cooked in the inside, though given their size a bit more caramelization on the sear might have been nice (and though they had very coarsely ground peppercorns in large chunks). But as evidence in the method of spoon-swirling streaks of two sauces next to the scallops and arraying the radishes around, the dish didn't really harmonize into a single note. And the cocoa butter slick was truly odd. Who wants rich goop on top of already rich scallops? Our other app was lamb neck which had a nice sear and was tender.
Entrees: pork cheek with roasted pear and an apple-turnip puree. Very rich, largely successful -- roasted pear was tasty and refreshing and still crisp; puree had good flavor. A fine dish. The salmon was much less successful. It was advertised as coming with cauliflower panna cotta, smoked roe, and potato, and I was surprised that it arrived with a large swoosh of the same cauliflower puree that was on my scallop plate. I was also surprised by the size of the piece of fish. For $24, I would have expected more than a 2x2.5inch square. But the bigger issue was that the fish, served skin side up (though not really crispy) was just totally unseasoned. Perhaps this was to counteract the smokey roe and the salty panna cotta, but it just wasn't a nice enough piece of fish to taste to be untreated. The potatoes were thinly sliced rounds of new (I think) potato, and they seem to have been smoked with rosemary - coming out interesting, if rather strong. And then the largest element was that unexpected repeat of the puree. LIke the scallop dish, this dish just lacked balance and integration.
Dessert was also a miss. An exceedingly molten chocolate cake modeled on a Dark and Stormy, with two different ginger treatments swirled next to it - one ginger syrup, the other a ginger foam. On top of the cake was a mint flavored chocolate sauce. Flavors were all fine and the concept was compelling, but there was a serious lack of texture problem - basically 4 elements on the plate, all goopy, none creamy, none crunchy. It also took quite awhile to come out, which our server explained as the fault of a large party ahead of us, but given that the place was only half full, it seemed (understandably) as though things were still getting their stride.
We loved the old place, and we appreciate the new place's ambition. They've been working fast, and will likely smooth out kinks. And they remain BYOB. So we'll be back eventually to see what's taken root. But we can't wholeheartedly recommend it.