David Hammond wrote:Last week, I had a martini, mixed by the Alinea crew, that had been aged in oak before it was served to me. It was called “Rye,” and the ingredients listed on the menu were Absolute Vodka, Pernod and lemon oil (I believe it was aged in a Templeton barrel). The hope, of course, was that the em-barreled beverage would take on some of the smoky, caramel or woodsy notes of the wood. At this point, I can’t say if the drink profited from being in the tun.
kl1191 wrote:the costs are pretty staggering.
mhill95149 wrote:Just to set the tone of your post, could you detail how you came to this event?
Was this a sponsored event? if so, who sponsored it? Were you charged for the drinks?
While I appreciate hearing of the next trend in drinks, it's great to know who is promoting the trends...
Please don't think that I'm being disrespectful, I just would love to hear
"I got invited to try some cocktails by a PR firm...." or whatever set the scene better than
"Last week, I had a martini, mixed by the Alinea crew,"
somehow there is more to the story and as a reader here I'd be interested in those details...
David Hammond wrote:kl1191 wrote:the costs are pretty staggering.
You mean because it involves experimenting with relatively large amounts of booze and no promise that the result will be worth the effort...or even drinkable?
kl1191 wrote:David Hammond wrote:kl1191 wrote:the costs are pretty staggering.
You mean because it involves experimenting with relatively large amounts of booze and no promise that the result will be worth the effort...or even drinkable?
Exactly...plus the investment in aging time, not to mention storage space and gaining the requisite knowledge on the topic (or obtaining the services of one of a--thus far very--limited number of individuals).
kl1191 wrote:[ the folks who convinced us we needed to use our vermouth quickly before it goes bad are the same ones promoting the depth of flavor that the oxidation of barrel aging can provide.
jpschust wrote:FWIW I made the Morganthaller Barrel Aged Negroni that was superb- I've served it at home along side one not barrel aged (same ratio, same ingredients) and the difference is quite striking.
David Hammond wrote:jpschust wrote:FWIW I made the Morganthaller Barrel Aged Negroni that was superb- I've served it at home along side one not barrel aged (same ratio, same ingredients) and the difference is quite striking.
Very interesting that you did a side-by-side. I'm guessing the barrel aged version was more intense? If you could, it'd be excellent to hear how the two versions differed...
jpschust wrote:David Hammond wrote:jpschust wrote:FWIW I made the Morganthaller Barrel Aged Negroni that was superb- I've served it at home along side one not barrel aged (same ratio, same ingredients) and the difference is quite striking.
Very interesting that you did a side-by-side. I'm guessing the barrel aged version was more intense? If you could, it'd be excellent to hear how the two versions differed...
I think intense is probably the wrong word for it- I'd call the barrel aged version more rounded- though I think the simple act of letting the ingredients sit together for a long time even in a glass jar would do some of that. The barrel aged negroni clearly picked up some of the barrel flavor but wasn't overwhelming- there was a layer of flavor that had smoke and took away some of the bitterness of the cocktail. I'm going to be in Chicago the Saturday after Thanksgiving, if you're in the loop I'd be happy to give you a bottle of the barrel aged version I've still got (I have about 8 bottles left of it)
FYI I used Campari (of course), Bombay gin, and Nolly Pratt Vermouth (sp?)
jpschust wrote:FYI I used Campari (of course), Bombay gin, and Nolly Pratt Vermouth (sp?)
Drykl1191 wrote:jpschust wrote:FYI I used Campari (of course), Bombay gin, and Nolly Pratt Vermouth (sp?)
Sapphire or Dry?
Yep, that onehappy_stomach wrote:David, you asked me the other day about my experience with barrel-aged cocktails. I said I had none, but in my sleep last night I somehow realized this wasn't true! I've had the Morgenthaler negroni (same Morganthaller as above, right?) at Clyde Common in Portland. That evening was pretty hazy, but the drink must have been more memorable than I originally thought if it came back to me in dreamland. I remember thinking the oil from the orange was almost too pronounced, but I think this may have been a side effect of all of the other ingredients being much more integrated than I expect from a regular negroni. FWIW.
Here's Morgenthaler's post on barrel-aged cocktails.
happy_stomach wrote:David, you asked me the other day about my experience with barrel-aged cocktails. I said I had none, but in my sleep last night I somehow realized this wasn't true! I've had the Morgenthaler negroni (same Morganthaller as above, right?) at Clyde Common in Portland. That evening was pretty hazy, but the drink must have been more memorable than I originally thought if it came back to me in dreamland. I remember thinking the oil from the orange was almost too pronounced, but I think this may have been a side effect of all of the other ingredients being much more integrated than I expect from a regular negroni. FWIW.
Here's Morgenthaler's post on barrel-aged cocktails.
kl1191 wrote:I had a barrel-aged Manhattan at the Violet Hour last night...can't say that it sold me on the concept. My initial, albeit somewhat harsh in retrospect, assessment was that it's a "Chardonnay drinker's Manhattan". Oak is the most noticeable component, followed by the darker, bitter notes of Punt e Mes, which have been accentuated by oxidation/age. Whiskey is almost an afterthought on the palate. Some Cocchi Americano is added to the aged mixture prior to service, which really helps with aroma, something I assume is lost quite a bit in the aging process. All in all, it's a good drink, but I'm not sure it's a drink meant for people who really enjoy whiskey or Manhattans. It's extremely mellow and drinkable, and (for me at least) an interesting thing to study, but not an improvement on the original from my perspective.
ronnie_suburban wrote: ...way more mellow than the original incarnations and they lack intensity, though they do offer some complexity. The sharpness and distinctive notes of the individual components get flattened out in a way that I'm not sure is for me.
mtgl wrote:I'll be honest, it might be easiest to take a page from homebrewers and use oak chips/cubes--much cheaper and simpler to 'control' or adjust. Plus you can go and toast the chips yourself if you want a little more of that character. Here is an interesting article from BYO on how to do so (with beer)--it goes through some of the logic of figuring out how much oak and how long. This might not be as refined as slow aging in a full-size barrel, but fifty bucks for a one-liter barrel just seems way overpriced and not technically superior, flavor-wise. Cubes would definitely yield a cheaper, more versatile, method and probably better taste to boot.